Hi Kristian,
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> I have then implemented[1, 2] a working prototype of an updated
> version of [0] taking into account response-times as measured from 3
> different locations in Europe (I welcome more, if anyone is up for
> running a measuring client[3, 4]).
http://keyser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07.05.2012 20:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 07.05.2012 20:44, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 07.05.2012 19:49, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> On 06.05.2012 01:01, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
After playing around with the setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07.05.2012 20:44, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 07.05.2012 19:49, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 06.05.2012 01:01, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> I can probably counter this by adjusting \phi (the error value for
> servers that are not r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07.05.2012 19:49, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 06.05.2012 01:01, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> I've been playing around with some thoughts on how to improve the
>> calculation of DNS Service Record (SRV) weights lately[0]. I
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06.05.2012 01:01, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been playing around with some thoughts on how to improve the
> calculation of DNS Service Record (SRV) weights lately[0]. I
> would, however, like to make use of the experience of oth
