Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-03-21 Thread brent s.
On 3/20/19 4:44 PM, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:> > I don't speak for all SKS server operators, but I do have a > configuration block in my NGINX configuration that specifically > identifies those keys and simply returns a 444 status code. > > I've been trying to get a handle on the

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-03-20 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 3/20/2019 2:42 PM, Andrew Nagy wrote: > All, > > Looking to figure out a solution here. A Maintainer on the Ubuntu > Key server informed me about discussion of the following keys > 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659 here: >

[Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-03-20 Thread Andrew Nagy
All, Looking to figure out a solution here. A Maintainer on the Ubuntu Key server informed me about discussion of the following keys 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659 here: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/sks-devel/2019-01/msg3.html Unfortunately the email address modu...@freepbx.org is just a

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-02-08 Thread Todd Fleisher
CPU cycles for the never-ending EventLoop alarm loops. The latter >>>> cause load-average spikes of up to 10 with just 4 Docker containers >>>> running on a 12 core system. >>>> Don't get me wrong. The throttling penalty is something I'd >>>> swallow-up

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-02-06 Thread Todd Fleisher
ith just 4 Docker containers >>> running on a 12 core system. >>> Don't get me wrong. The throttling penalty is something I'd >>> swallow-up >>> as long as we keep the network running. >>> Regards, >>> Martin >>> keyserver.dobrev.eu | pg

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-02-06 Thread Rolf Wuerdemann
age From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Date: 30/01/2019 20:18 (GMT+00:00) To: Shengjing Zhu , sks-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659 On 1/12/19 8:15 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: I think these requests are quite unusual. Does anyone know what happ

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-02-04 Thread Martin Dobrev
;> Regards, >> Martin >> >> keyserver.dobrev.eu | pgp.dobrev.it >> >> -------- Original message ---- >> From: Kristian Fiskerstrand >> >> Date: 30/01/2019 20:18 (GMT+00:00) >> To: Shengjing Zhu , sks-devel@nongnu.org >> Subject

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-02-04 Thread Rolf Wuerdemann
.eu | pgp.dobrev.it Original message From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Date: 30/01/2019 20:18 (GMT+00:00) To: Shengjing Zhu , sks-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659 On 1/12/19 8:15 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: I think these reque

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-01-30 Thread Martin Dobrev
Date: 30/01/2019 20:18 (GMT+00:00) To: Shengjing Zhu , sks-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659 On 1/12/19 8:15 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote:>  I think these requests are quite unusual.> Does anyone know what happens to these two key

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-01-30 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 1/12/19 8:15 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > I think these requests are quite unusual. > Does anyone know what happens to these two keys? Just to add a comment on this, adding a cache on the load-balancer is really a nice way to slow down hits on the underlying SKS nodes, I keep cache for 10

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-01-12 Thread brent s.
On 1/13/19 1:49 AM, Gabor Kiss wrote: >> Request counted in 2h: >> >>178 0xB33B4659 >> 186 0x69D2EAD9 >> 290 0x2016349F5BC6F49340FCCAF99F9169F4B33B4659 >> 336 0x1013D73FECAC918A0A25823986CE877469D2EAD9 > > I checked my logs. 15% of the recent 18k requests were related to these

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-01-12 Thread Gabor Kiss
> Request counted in 2h: > >178 0xB33B4659 > 186 0x69D2EAD9 > 290 0x2016349F5BC6F49340FCCAF99F9169F4B33B4659 > 336 0x1013D73FECAC918A0A25823986CE877469D2EAD9 I checked my logs. 15% of the recent 18k requests were related to these keys. They belong to: FreePBX Module Signing

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-01-12 Thread brent s.
On 1/13/19 12:15 AM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > Sorry for top replying. I'm using mobile phone. > > Requests are coming from different network, at least hundreds IP. > > And it seems my server(pgp.ustc.edu.cn ) is down > again... I'll check it when I got home. If it's caused

Re: [Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-01-12 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Sorry for top replying. I'm using mobile phone. Requests are coming from different network, at least hundreds IP. And it seems my server(pgp.ustc.edu.cn) is down again... I'll check it when I got home. If it's caused by the two keys.. I may blacklist them... brent s. 于 2019年1月13日周日 04:45写道: >

[Sks-devel] Unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659

2019-01-12 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Hi, While I rescued my key server back this night, I found the unusual traffic for key 0x69D2EAD9 and 0xB33B4659. It caused load to my server when it tried to sync up with the network. Request counted in 2h: 178 0xB33B4659 186 0x69D2EAD9 290 0x2016349F5BC6F49340FCCAF99F9169F4B33B4659