On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 06:28:24PM +1000, Haw Loeung wrote:
> I don't think these patches should land in SKS. It's to work around
> one key and doesn't scale very well. Instead, I think more work should
> be done adding the ability to not accept and send keys of a certain
> size as well as options
Hi Tom,
I spend the night on the keydump - keys.flanga.io is now also running
with hockeypuck (I did not test anything to be honest though ;)). I'll
see if it runs stable (not sure if it is pool compatible) - version is
1.1.6.
A short write-up for installing this thing is already done - I can
Just saying...
...the person who created that key has finally started a long overdue
process. They are likely reading this as well, so: Thank you. This could
otherwise have ended much worse.
To the other readers, but only to those of them who do not agree with the
following sentences: Please
Hi sks-Guys,
I know, there are already discussions about getting rid of the many
Berkley DB logs.
Furthermore, I would like to ask you all for the best practise or YOUR
best practise for standard maintance jobs (cronjobs etc.) during
operating of sks keyservers.
Best Regards
Fabian 'otih'
