On 23.08.2019 06:13, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> Dear Kristian,
>
> This screenshot was created this morning. (Cca. 04:00 UTC)
> http://bakacsin.ki.iif.hu/~kissg/tmp/sks-pool_screenshot.png
Thanks for reporting, that's curious...
>
> Regards
>
> Gabor
>
--
Dear Kristian,
This screenshot was created this morning. (Cca. 04:00 UTC)
http://bakacsin.ki.iif.hu/~kissg/tmp/sks-pool_screenshot.png
Regards
Gabor
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
You've seemingly overlooked that the message was typed on a cell and
the autocorrect isn't designed for English. 'This message was sent from
my Android phone via K-9 Mail.' And because you instantly become
personal in your first post and aren't engaging with the real issues,
you're dead as a
Hi Robert,
I love that story; saved it in my Documents folder! :D
When one of my female friends refers to me or another male friend, they
usually use Kumpel (buddy) as workaround term for this problem.
Another possibility is:
Das ist ein Freund von mir (that's a friend of mine)
The ein (a / one)
It's a facepalm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=wjLgekyOZA0#t=57
(I did the facepalm several times over the course of this convsersation.)
-Christian.
On 20/04/14 19:51, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but i'm curious to know what this smiley means, if
On 14-04-20 20:22:53, Christian Reiß, wrote 2.5K characters saying:
It's a facepalm.
(I did the facepalm several times over the course of this convsersation.)
I think I'll take that the good way :P
On 20/04/14 19:51, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but i'm curious to know
*PLONK*
Could someone please do me a kindness [...]
Phil,
Have you ever seen this lovely sign? :-)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Trolls.jpg
Gabor
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
Hi,
okay, I hope I don't need to explain why this e-mail caused me to remove
you, Simon Lange, from my peering list.
It makes me sad to see such childish behavior on a mailing list like
this one.
btw, ur english doesnt make u look more kewl. c y?
Best regards,
Tobias Frei
Am 19.04.2014
Agree. Ppl get personal swearing against me but dont had the kindness to read
the post and try to understand it.
All i did critizize was the lack of proper techdoc and that informationflow is
waterdrop by waterdrop. Not a reason to insult me.
If you give a fuck for poolmember's feedback then
Hi list,
Trying to be a bit more on-topic again...
On 04/18/2014 10:42 PM, Simon Lange wrote:
Am 18.04.2014 22:10, schrieb Martin Papik:
Answering ALL host names just makes you willing to participate in any
pool by default, without extra maintenance. But again, AFAIK this
isn't a
Agree. Ppl get personal swearing against me but dont had the kindness to read
the post and try to understand it.
All i did critizize was the lack of proper techdoc and that informationflow is
waterdrop by waterdrop. Not a reason to insult me.
If you give a fuck for poolmember's feedback then
Agree. Ppl get personal swearing against me but dont had the kindness
to read the post and try to understand it.
I have read all the posts in this thread and done my best to understand
them. Some things I can't decipher, like
Hust bame it.
... which is, IMO, a case study in why standard
Hi,
maybe you need to send a correct Via: header to allow automatic
detection of the reverse proxy. If proxying is done completely
transparent, there is probably no way to see that there is actually a
proxy in front of sks. That's what I would assume, at least.
Best regards,
Tobias Frei
Am
Er, sorry, I see you already do that. Then maybe the automatic
detection failed for whatever reason.
And I just noticed that your status changed to OK. Weird^^
Best regards,
Tobias Frei
Am 18.04.2014 13:30, schrieb Tobias Frei:
Hi,
maybe you need to send a correct Via: header to allow
Hi,
On 04/17/2014 04:20 PM, Simon Lange (BIT) wrote:
well, but there IS a reverse proxy. ;)
tcp0 0 78.46.21.218:11371 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
8804/lighttpd
If I remember right, the monitor checks for a 'VIA' header. See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I don't know who maintains the monitor, but this email chain prompted
me to have a quick look at the differences between the responses
between a reverse proxy and SKS and I found a few differences and how
to detect a reverse proxy. I've come up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
after directly communicating with Kristian via twitter i could enlight
the whole situation.
first. the whole process lacks of rudementary technical documentation.
second. if the requirement is a reverse proxy and there is one, but your
script
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/18/2014 09:24 PM, Simon Lange wrote:
yesterday i learned i have to give up control who is using his
domain with my services. :/
Please explain, I'm not aware of such a requirement and if there is
such I would like to know about it so I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.04.2014 21:18, schrieb Martin Papik:
On 04/18/2014 09:24 PM, Simon Lange wrote:
yesterday i learned i have to give up control who is using his
domain with my services. :/
Please explain, I'm not aware of such a requirement and if there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/18/2014 10:37 PM, Simon Lange wrote:
Ive been told that it is required to allow ALL incoming traffic to
the IP of my keyserver for port 11371 no matter what hostname is
requested. that would - of course - allow everyone on this planet
to
Hi,
sorry for my naivity, but I can't really think of a scenario where it
would be a problem that your PGP keyserver (and only that one,
keys.s-l-c.biz) is accessible under any other domain name.
If your keyserver is accessible at insert-racist-domain-name-here.tld,
so what? Does that make you a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.04.2014 22:10, schrieb Martin Papik:
Answering ALL host names just makes you willing to participate in any
pool by default, without extra maintenance. But again, AFAIK this
isn't a requirement. Am I misinformed?
im afraid gpg wont show that while using it. ;)
but for the webinterface its valid. ;)
but i see you understand now my problem. ;)
Simon
Am 18.04.2014 22:38, schrieb Tobias Frei:
Hi,
simply add this page is served by keys.s-l-c.biz; I am in no way
affiliated with other hostnames which might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/18/2014 11:42 PM, Simon Lange wrote:
https://twitter.com/krifisk/status/456717051340791808 With a HTTP
Host header not belonging to the specific hostname? Note the -H
'Host.' , 11371 should allow ALL traffic through
Sounds more like a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-04-18 at 20:24 +0200, Simon Lange wrote:
the reason why a reverse proxy is required is, because some
require additional security at the nodes.
False.
The SKS software is single threaded and handles a single request at a
time. One
On 04/18/2014 04:42 PM, Simon Lange wrote:
bad ppl could pretend offering a public service using my machines they
dont own nor they administre nor they run. my machines would support
that passivly. think this is easy to understand. and also has some legal
implications. just imagine feds want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.04.2014 23:16, schrieb Phil Pennock:
On 2014-04-18 at 20:24 +0200, Simon Lange wrote:
the reason why a reverse proxy is required is, because some
require additional security at the nodes.
False.
ehm. nope. thats is what ive been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.04.2014 23:39, schrieb Martin Papik:
By the way, Phil's email explains why it's required, and now I
understand why it's a true requirement, at least for servers in the
pool. For non pool servers it doesn't matter.
since i only talked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.04.2014 23:24, schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
On 04/18/2014 04:42 PM, Simon Lange wrote:
bad ppl could pretend offering a public service using my machines they
dont own nor they administre nor they run. my machines would support
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-04-19 at 02:21 +0200, Simon Lange wrote:
Am 18.04.2014 23:16, schrieb Phil Pennock:
-Phil
*PLONK*
Could someone please do me a kindness and pass on a message to Mr Lange?
Maintaining a keyserver peering requires the ability to
Hi,
im a it supprised. i just stumbled over:
https://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/keys.s-l-c.biz
which says that my keyserver was last seen three days ago. im not
enlisted anymore and the status page cannot even say what server im
running etc etc
im a bit wondered. why?
i can reach it via
Hi,
from the status page you've linked:
Latest status: Not OK
Reason: Not running a reverse proxy
Best regards,
Tobias Frei
Am 17.04.2014 01:13, schrieb Simon Lange:
Hi,
im a it supprised. i just stumbled over:
https://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/keys.s-l-c.biz
which says that my
well, but there IS a reverse proxy. ;)
tcp0 0 78.46.21.218:11371 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 8804/lighttpd
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:11371 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 10018/sks
tcp6 0 0 2a01:4f8:201:22e3:11371 :::*
I see reconciliation errors caused by mismatched filters. I suspect
that this is simple version skew.
Now that we have both SKS and GnuKS, *before* people start adding new
filters, should we add the current filters to the status page, early
enough to try to get both variants to include the
34 matches
Mail list logo
