I realize that the SBo volunteers do a lot of work for the Slackware
community, and I would not want to unduly add to the workload. Having said
that, would the work load be acceptable if
(a) you created the categories (fonts and Slackware-specific), and
(b) whenever a maintainer puts in a new
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:00 (+0700), Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
>> Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
>> system tools. Would it be better to have a separate category (fonts)
>> for them?
> This is my personal opinion and do not express other admin's opinion
Hello everybody,
Just an opinion:
In case you decide to add new categories, I believe this could be done at
slow steps.
First, just create the desired categories. Then, let the maintainers add
and/or move their scripts to the appropriate category. In the meantime, the
SBo admins could move some
OK, so in that case, why do we have categories at all? Would it bother
you to get rid of them entirely? Other than the amount of work it
would take to accomplish it, I mean. Would we be better off if there
had never been categories?
actually removing it will have more work to do as to change
"B. Watson" writes:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
>
>> Since we have search form in our website, i wonder how many people would go
>> through each categories when looking for some scripts instead of just using
>> the
>> search form?
>
> OK, so in that case, why do we
It is good to have suggestion, but then all decision is by the slackbuild admin.
For the use case, I occasionally browser through the categories not
looking for a particular
package but to discover what packages are available for Slackware and sometimes
found some packages that I would want to
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
Since we have search form in our website, i wonder how many people would go
through each categories when looking for some scripts instead of just using
the search form?
OK, so in that case, why do we have categories at all? Would it
On 3/19/24 11:31 AM, Qun-Ying wrote:
[...] Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
system tools. Would it be better to have a separate category (fonts)
for them?
yes
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
system tools. Would it be better to have a separate category (fonts)
for them?
This is my personal opinion and do not express other admin's opinion
i think having more categories doesn't really give benefits to this
project
slackware-specific
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:27:45PM +0100, j+sbo-us...@maschinengott.de wrote:
> On 20.03.24 07:32, Lockywolf wrote:>
> > +1 for fonts as its own category, and, if possible, please, one more
> > category for "slackware-specific" stuffs, such as:
>
> As a few people have spoken
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 5:44 AM Luc Van Rompaey
wrote:
>
> "slack-tools" or some such?
>
>
> j+sbo-us...@maschinengott.de schreef op 20 maart 2024 12:27:45 CET:
+1 for "slack-tools"
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
"slack-tools" or some such?
j+sbo-us...@maschinengott.de schreef op 20 maart 2024 12:27:45 CET:
>On 20.03.24 07:32, Lockywolf wrote:>
>> +1 for fonts as its own category, and, if possible, please, one more
>> category for "slackware-specific" stuffs, such as:
>
>As a few people have spoken in
On 3/19/24 11:32 PM, Lockywolf wrote:
[...] +1 for fonts as its own category, and, if possible, please, one more
category for "slackware-specific" stuffs, such as:
1. slackrepo
2. slackrepo-hints
3. sbotools
4. sbo-create
5. sbo-maintainer-tools
6. sbotools
7. sboui
8. slpkg
9. listpkg
10.
On 20.03.24 07:32, Lockywolf wrote:>
> +1 for fonts as its own category, and, if possible, please, one more
> category for "slackware-specific" stuffs, such as:
As a few people have spoken in favour of this, what would be a good
name? Just to get the conversation going: I think "slackware" is
Hi list
That would be great for the 2 proposals.
Regards
--
Tonus
Le 20 mars 2024 08:32:29 GMT+01:00, David Chmelik a
écrit :
>On 3/19/24 11:32 PM, Lockywolf wrote:
>> KB_SBo writes:
>> On 3/19/24 11:31, Qun-Ying wrote:
[...] Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix
I'd be in favor of both new categories.
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ -
On 3/19/24 11:32 PM, Lockywolf wrote:
KB_SBo writes:
On 3/19/24 11:31, Qun-Ying wrote:
[...] Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
system tools. Would it be better to have a separate category (fonts)
for them?
+1 for fonts as its own category
-kb [...]
+1 for
Il 19/03/24 19:31, Qun-Ying ha scritto:
Hi,
Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
system tools. Would it be better to have a separate category (fonts)
for them?
It seems a good idea
--
*
Giancarlo Dessì
+1
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024, 1:41 AM Lockywolf <
for_slackbuilds-users_mlist_2023-04...@lockywolf.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> KB_SBo writes:
>
> > On 3/19/24 11:31, Qun-Ying wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
> >> system tools. Would it be better to
KB_SBo writes:
> On 3/19/24 11:31, Qun-Ying wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
>> system tools. Would it be better to have a separate category (fonts)
>> for them?
>>
>>
>
> +1 for fonts as its own category
>
> -kb
>
>
>
>
On 3/19/24 11:31, Qun-Ying wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
> system tools. Would it be better to have a separate category (fonts)
> for them?
>
>
+1 for fonts as its own category
-kb
___
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Qun-Ying wrote:
Currently fonts are put under category system, they mix with other
system tools. Would it be better to have a separate category (fonts)
for them?
If we're voting, I vote for this.
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing
22 matches
Mail list logo
