[Slackbuilds-users] findpkg version mismatch in .info

2016-10-17 Thread Arnaud
Hi everybody ! findpkg is on version 20160817 both on the file to download in findpkg.info and on the SlackBuild script, but the VERSION in the findpkg.info file is still 20160710. It could confuse some auto-build scripts... Best regards, Arnaud.

[Slackbuilds-users] Fixed and updated KeePass

2016-10-17 Thread Thomas Szteliga
Hello, + Upgraded to 2.34 + Fixed icons source path + Fixed installation prefix to /usr/lib/KeePass (removed version) as discussed here: https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/2016-August/016930.html + Fixed SlackBuild to match new template (586) + Fixed final

[Slackbuilds-users] Recoll dependencies

2016-10-17 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Hi, The Recoll application currently lists three optional dependencies: * antiword * unrtf * exiftool I would suggest to mark these as requirements, since the application keeps nagging the user if the tools are not installed on the system. This nagging can not be turned off in the preferences.

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] gwyddion 2.46 requires libminizip

2016-10-17 Thread Daniil Bratashov
Yes, there is a problem with recent gwyddion builds, I'll try to fix it and upload modified slackbuild. On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Daniil Bratashov wrote: > It should fall back to libzip if libminizip is not installed, however > I've not tried it without libminizip

[Slackbuilds-users] gwyddion 2.46 requires libminizip

2016-10-17 Thread Fellype do Nascimento
Hi all, libminizip is currently assigned as an optional dependence of gwyddion. But when upgrading gwyddion 2.45 -> 2.46 I got the following error(s): jpkscan.c: In function 'match_segment_filename': jpkscan.c:804:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'atoi'

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Recoll dependencies

2016-10-17 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 17/10/2016 à 23:09, Tito a écrit : > Hi Niki and all, > > I would be fine with that. Could you please send me your submission > tarball for untex, it still is in pending and so it is not accessible > via git. I would like to test it before I submit a recoll upgrade. > After all without these