The parameter "auto-version-control" (Domain.xml) specifies whether
newly created resources are automatically put under version-control.
Whether auto-versioning is turned on or off, and what style of
auto-versioning applies, is defined at resource level - i.e. can be
defined individually for a re
> Thanks for your help. So for an entirely new installation
> (with no existing
> files) if I set "auto-version-control" in Domain.xml to false
> then for all documents created on the server from that point
> on auto-versioning will be disabled?
Not exactly. Newly created documents will not be
Maybe the following does help?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06933.html
Regards,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Hu Yong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 11:55
> To: Slide Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: a question about version-control
Jun,
currently it's a *must* in Slide. The Slide "helpers" (which build-up
the Slide engine) internally need read access to all upstream folders to
check permissions and locking, or resolve bindings. As currently the
"helpers" cannot distinguish internal from original calls, they check
the precondi
Well, yes ... although I wasn't thinking about a solution yet :)
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 15:16
> To: Slide Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Why need read privilege on upstream folders to
> achie
> In detail 2.2 will have much more fain grained locks which will add to
the
> multi user scalability. Additionally, larger collections will be
practical
> at least with certain backend stores.
Oliver, what is the state of these enhancements? Is it already in the
HEAD branch? If not, when will
Hi,
found in this list many postings about URL encoding ... but nothing
about content encoding.
In a project using Slide/Tamino which I am coaching, XHTML documents are
stored using MS Word, where it is important to know the encoding of the
content. Unfortunately, MS Word 2003 does *not* sent the
Hi Sven,
please try
/slide/files/users;/slide/files/public
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Sven Pfeiffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 11:48
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: versioncontrol-exclude for subfolders
it seems like there is a
> The following warning is reported (catalina.out). If I change
> 'GroupNode' to 'SubjectNode' it loads fine. I really need to use
> GroupNode to represent groups?
No, you don't. Just use SubjectNode.
Currently, the ACL-Draft-12 compliant implementation is coexisting with the previous
security
Hi Juan Andres,
yes, Slide 2.0 supports versioning (DeltaV) for file versioning.
Yes, you can use auto-versioning.
In the Slide config file "Domain.xml" there are 2 parameters which control
auto-versioning:
- auto-version
- auto-version-control
Regards,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> Fr
Hi Juan Andrés,
I think I understand you well. DeltaV as defined in RFC3253 is entirely implemented in
the WebDAV layer of Slide, i.e. is not available at the native Slide API level. On the
other hand, at Slide API level you have versioning as well (versions are called
revisions at this level),
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Shulinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 01:29
> To: 'Slide Users Mailing List'
> Subject: How to add/remove a user - role relationship
>
>
> Hi, all!
>
> I've started to use Slide API in my app and got a couple of
> que
So, didn't my answer from yesterday help?
Did I misunderstand your question?
Regards,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob Lund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:46
> To: 'Slide Users Mailing List'
> Subject: structure of History and how to clean up
>
>
> Is there any sample code to show how to use the new
> ACL-Draft-12 group stuff?
Please have a look at default Domain.xml shipped with Slide 2.0b1. There, you'll find
4 users configured: /users/root, /users/john, /users/john2 and /users/guest. Moreover,
there are 3 roles configured: /roles/roo
The problem is that you cannot map two scopes for the same store:
So, define a separate store HISTORY_TESTCOM_WORKSPACES for /history/testComWorkspaces
... which of course can be configured to use the same DB as TESTCOM_WORKSPACES. Same
for TESTCOM_PROJECTS.
Regard
Maybe you want give WVCM (JSR-147) a try?
You can find a kind of reference impl in Slide's CVS at proposals/wvcm.
Regards,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Chamberlain James O. CONTR J9C998
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 19:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
Hi,
can somebody recommend a free + java-based HTTP Sniffer?
Currently I'm using NetTool from Neil O'Toole [http://www.nettool.org] ... which isn't
bad ... but I'd like to see some alternatives.
TIA and regards,
Peter
-
To uns
Hi, I'm a newbie with WebLogic ... has anybody experience with the deployment of Slide
on WebLogic?
It works fine for me with security switched-off.
But when I try to use security, after adapting the realm for WebLogic, I get problems
with the class loaders. I get it only work if I put certai
Thanks, Oliver.
> this seems to be the same problem as with Tomcat, but I do not think
> common/lib or server/lib do exist in WebLogic, do they?
Well, I found something like C:\bea\weblogic81\common\lib and
C:\bea\weblogic81\server\lib ... B-)
> You will have to
> find a locations for the real
> >
> > Well, I found something like C:\bea\weblogic81\common\lib and
> > C:\bea\weblogic81\server\lib ... B-)
> >
>
> Ah, ok. So put *only* the real wrapper to server/lib, the rest to
> common/lib. This way it might work.
Well, that's the way it works in Tomcat ... but not in WebLogic :-(
Re
Hi Mihir
the Slide command line client is quite buggy. You *can* add a property
"password" with value "123" to a user "sally" by:
$ proppatch /slide/users/sally password 123
Unfortunately, I have no idea how to set the property's namespace
(http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/).
Maybe you should
Hi Chris,
1. That's because the so-called advanced features of DeltaV (activities is one of
them, the others are merge, baselines and versioned-collections) are not yet
implemented in Slide Server (... hopefully, they will be eventually ...). Also at
client-side (WVCM), the parts corresponding
Hi Warwick,
please find attached an extension of the default Domain.xml files with 2
additional stores configured to serve /slide/files_2 and
/slide/files_secondCollection as needed for the testsuite.
Regards,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Warwick Burrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi Jason
please use branch TWS421_BRANCH instead of tag TAMINOWEBDAVSERVER_4_2_1
and please compile against *current* of SLIDE_2_0_RELEASE_BRANCH (so,
Slide 2.0.1 will some day be the correct binary to take).
Regards,
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Harrop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
24 matches
Mail list logo
