On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 09:37, John Clarke wrote:
[nice summary snipped]
> To add a new directory into $PATH:
>
> PATH=$PATH:/new/directory
> export PATH
>
> or:
>
> PATH=/new/directory:$PATH
> export PATH
>
> depending upon whether you want it to be searched first or last.
I'v
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 05:53:39AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> you don't need an MX record.. an A is tried if no MX exists..
True -- i didn't realise this. For those interested, seems to be a
requirement of RFC974. I wonder what prompted the author to give the
'benefit of the doubt' to servers w
>
> although there is a dummy SMTP server at that IP, I'd say that is
> there because if it wasn't, other than getting an error you'd get
> timeouts. But futher, there is no MX record so mail should never get
> that far.
you don't need an MX record.. an A is tried if no MX exists..
Dave.
>
> --
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:21 pm, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> Point your browser at http://dfgdfgsfdgd.net/ or
> http://sfhjsjfhkshfjshdfjkhsdfhjsd.net/ or
> http://www.fdjlfdjkfdskdsfhjdsfhjdshdsfjkl.com/
>
> Those .net domains aren't registered... but they now point at a Verisign
> webpage rather than not
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 02:34:30PM +1000, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> It also does a nice job of destroying the "non-existant sender" spam
> defense, since every non-existant .com and .net apparently now has a
> mail server:
> http://linuxchix.org/pipermail/techtalk/2003-September/016294.html
well i'm
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> Point your browser at http://dfgdfgsfdgd.net/ or
> http://sfhjsjfhkshfjshdfjkhsdfhjsd.net/ or
> http://www.fdjlfdjkfdskdsfhjdsfhjdshdsfjkl.com/
>
> Those .net domains aren't registered... but they now point at a Verisign
> webpage rather than not resolv
Point your browser at http://dfgdfgsfdgd.net/ or
http://sfhjsjfhkshfjshdfjkhsdfhjsd.net/ or
http://www.fdjlfdjkfdskdsfhjdsfhjdshdsfjkl.com/
Those .net domains aren't registered... but they now point at a Verisign
webpage rather than not resolving. Verisign has decided to use
unregistered domains a
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:42:56PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Yep! That should work very nicely. :-)
Thanks Jeff, and everyone else who contributed.
Cheers,
John
--
whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key id: 0xD59C360F
http://kirriwa.net/john/
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.a
Hi Sluggers,
As some of you may or may not know Computerbnk Sydney has been formed to
handle the day-to-day running of Computerbank projects in the Sydney
Region so to that end we're having a Hardware Day/membership drive/public
meeting this weekend.
Date: Sunday 21st September 2003
Location:
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 11:04, Adam Hewitt wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 05:30, Brendan Dacre wrote:
>
> > My conclusion is that I need to do something more to make the the
> > modules load correctly on boot up. Does anyone know what this is?
> >
> > Brendan
>
> Have you added your username to
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:24:50PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
> > it's probably better to use the transports table.
>
> Ah, thanks Jeff, I think I finally understand what I need to do. Setup
> the transports (amavis out and in) in master.cf, but instead of using
> content_filter, I add an en
> Hi all,
Hi there,
> Installed Xine, but can't find it. I have been searching for the ".exe"
> for xine.
You'll be out of luck, then. Linux, like all other forms of Unix,
doesn't need or use a .exe suffix to identify an executable file.
The executable for Xine, as it happens, is generally just
Hi Grant:
These commands are they browser based
or command line based ?
Cheers.
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Parnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 14 September 2003 09:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Weird HTML Omitting code via
>
> This could be caused by an add filtering proxy. Is the image
> an add or hosted on a different server to the HTML file?
The image is hosted on the same server as the HTML file.
I also am experiencing this problem with
tags where for some reason some elements
won't show on the browser when
Did you uncomment
AllowOverride All
Options MultiViews -Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
Was defaulted in commonhttpd.conf
--
Simon Males <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No More AOL CDs Australia - www.anticd.org
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Gr
I've LaTeX'd the pages, all is well.
I'd like to print the pages on either side (ie., duplex)
of sheets of landscaped A4.
I don't want them tumbled.
I'd like page 1 printed, say, 3cm from the LH edge, then the
sheet flipped right to left, then page 2 printed 3cm from the
RH edge, ie., exactly be
16 matches
Mail list logo
