On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 10:02, Peter Chubb wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone had any experience with the Sharp Zaurus, or other
Linux-based PDAs? I'm particularly interested in how usable they are
for usual PDA type stuff (like the Datebook etc., functionality on a
PalmOs device), as well as for the
Has anyone succeeded in installing this driver and getting it going on a
2.6.3 kernel. Rumour is that the mini PCI driver code merged at rc1 and
should now work in 2.6.3-rc1+.
I've been having issues on a thinkpad X31.
Thinking I need to go backwards in firmware Revs..
Where is the best place
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:38 pm, Howard Lowndes wrote:
*snipped*
Unless employers have a court order, they will need to give employees
notice that surveillance will be conducted, he said.
That could mean a warning box pops up when the computer is turned on.
We already have a pre-login message on
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I belive it's in part because of this:
Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Bill 2004
http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/browse.aspx?NodeID=173
It will also be illegal to archive emails, or to appraise
them as
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:43, James Gray wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:38 pm, Howard Lowndes wrote:
*snipped*
Unless employers have a court order, they will need to give employees
notice that surveillance will be conducted, he said.
That could mean a warning box pops up when the computer
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:31:44AM +1100, Grant Parnell wrote:
Looks like jkljhlkajhslkjh.tv or anything.tv resolves to the same IP...
Hmm... looks like they're trying what they did with .com a few months
back only it's really backfired.
It'd be nice if this were enough to convince Verislime
At Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:47:12 +1000, Mary Gardiner wrote:
I'm accustomed to starting my various Python and Perl files with:
#!/usr/bin/env python
or
#!/usr/bin/env perl
However, you can't pass arguments to whatever you're invoking, thanks to
the limits of the #! interpretion (#!/usr/bin/env
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 09:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently had to unsubscribe from the OOo mailing list. The reason:
I received so many copys of an email that was autogenerated by exim that
it filled my mailbox and caused it to refuse further posts. Is this a fault
within exim or
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 21:17, Howard Lowndes wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I belive it's in part because of this:
Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Bill 2004
http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/browse.aspx?NodeID=173
It will also be
Recipient of the infected attachment: HOMER, First Storage Group\Mailbox Store
(HOMER), Chas Honton/Inbox
Subject of the message: Re: details
One or more attachments were deleted
Attachment details.zip was Deleted for the following reasons:
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.
Virus
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 10:51, Benno wrote:
Questions about ELX products should probably be directed
to them: http://www.everythinglinux.com.au/contact.php3
Well, I actually thought it was appropriate as I always use laptops and
the winmodems are always the most troublesome. Therefore, I thought
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 00:44, Rajnish Tiwari wrote:
Hi All,
I need to install the package corresponding to development
tools onto a RH EL server - but it doesn't have X-Windows.
I guess the good old command line interface (CLI) is the option.
Assuming I've found the
There is nothing that says that you have to allow your employees to have
email access other than that which is work related.
They might scream, but screw them...
Their screams are sweet music to the BOFH, and me :-)
Now picture this, you are the IT admin and you've no personal e-mail
Dave Airlie wrote:
There is nothing that says that you have to allow your employees to have
email access other than that which is work related.
They might scream, but screw them...
Their screams are sweet music to the BOFH, and me :-)
Now picture this, you are the IT admin and you've no
I think you are hitting the extremist view. By
following your concept businesses would also
remove B2B, B2C etc. How are you going to ensure
your connectivity is functioning and secure?
It's not going to happen. Why?
Computer systems need to be kept up to date.
Many businesses, do business using
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 13:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it comes down to ethics when I was working for a
top 10 fortune 500 organisation I was asked to snoop. I
turned it down stating it's not ethical unless they have a
valid reason and I would prefer to hear that command from
HR or the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/03/2004 01:05:41 PM:
--snip--
Dave.
True. I am also subject to the AUP. However, I need SSH for my job,
SSH can forward ports and thus my life will go on as normal. Most of
what I do is shell-based anyway (mutt, slrn, nethack etc), so not using
a
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 16:38, Howard Lowndes wrote:
hfl
I guess there are a few of out there that will be needing some legal
opinions on this one and some re-defined acceptable practice
conditions. It looks like a minefield.
/hfl
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1077250.htm
The
Folks, I'd love to chuck out a Windows 2000 server however it is used to
push group policies down to windows clients. This includes such things
as the default proxy, default settings, what the user can/cannot change
and other admin things.
I was wondering if there is anyway I can do this from a
On Wed Mar 31, 2004 at 14:41:15 +1000, Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 16:38, Howard Lowndes wrote:
hfl
I guess there are a few of out there that will be needing some legal
opinions on this one and some re-defined acceptable practice
conditions. It looks like a minefield.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 02:46:28PM +1000, Matt Hyne wrote:
Folks, I'd love to chuck out a Windows 2000 server however it is used to
push group policies down to windows clients. This includes such things
as the default proxy, default settings, what the user can/cannot change
and other admin
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004, Benno wrote:
Wow, I'm amazed at this `workers as slave' mentality people have.
The employer as essentially honest (in the just trying to make an
honest busk sense) and employee as regretfully necessary dishonest
money sink thing is also a bit odd.
-Mary
--
SLUG - Sydney
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Benno wrote:
Wow, I'm amazed at this `workers as slave' mentality people have. I
would not like to work in an office, or for a company, with such
policies, it sounds like a depressing, draining, stressful environment
to work in. (I'd wonder how productive/creative a
On Wed Mar 31, 2004 at 15:26:48 +1000, David wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Benno wrote:
Wow, I'm amazed at this `workers as slave' mentality people have. I
would not like to work in an office, or for a company, with such
policies, it sounds like a depressing, draining, stressful environment
Mary == Mary Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mary On Tue, Mar 30, 2004, DE LUCA Ben wrote:
Ive just tested it on gentoo and osx and both of them accept
arguments
Mary Latest env on Debian unstable doesn't. env on Solaris does.
It's not env, it's the kernel.
The kernel invokes an
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 14:51, Benno wrote:
On Wed Mar 31, 2004 at 14:41:15 +1000, Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 16:38, Howard Lowndes wrote:
hfl
I guess there are a few of out there that will be needing some legal
opinions on this one and some re-defined acceptable
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:26, David wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Benno wrote:
It's like everything else... in the end management has to create an
environment where work WILL get done. At my place there is a clear policy
(set by me) that says you play all you like as long as you don't stop
On Wed Mar 31, 2004 at 16:33:34 +1000, Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 14:51, Benno wrote:
On Wed Mar 31, 2004 at 14:41:15 +1000, Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 16:38, Howard Lowndes wrote:
hfl
I guess there are a few of out there that will be needing
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 13:34, Howard Lowndes wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 13:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it comes down to ethics when I was working for a
top 10 fortune 500 organisation I was asked to snoop. I
turned it down stating it's not ethical unless they have a
valid
29 matches
Mail list logo
