Re: [SLUG] Problem in using scp

2006-08-08 Thread Gavin Carr
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:42:13PM +1000, Michael Lake wrote: > Hi all > > I am trying to do this: > > cat file | sed s/this/that/g | scp - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/someplace/ > > As I want to replace some strings in file and copy it to another server in > a Makefile line. It looks like scp does

[SLUG] Problem in using scp

2006-08-08 Thread Michael Lake
Hi all I am trying to do this: cat file | sed s/this/that/g | scp - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/someplace/ As I want to replace some strings in file and copy it to another server in a Makefile line. It looks like scp doesn't recognise - as "take input from its stdin". How can I do what I intend?

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Peter Hardy
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 08:14 +1000, Peter Miller wrote: > Is it possible to have a DHCP server tell a DHCP client what the > appropriate HELO string will be for the other side of the NAT? > If not, is it possible to figure this out from everything else the > client is given by the DHCP server? Debi

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:18:05 +1000, Craig Dibble uttered > Er, sorry to nitpick, but 993 is actually IMAP SSL. > > POP3S is 995 > I realised that after I bashed C-c C-c to send the message. :-/ Cheers, -- Steve "I'm a doctor, not a doorstop" - EM

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Craig Dibble
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Aw man, you're picking nits that are sitting on the nit that Steve already picked. You're almost picking meta-nits. Heh-heh, true, I should have said nitnitpick, but at least I pre-emptively apologised ;-) -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http:/

[SLUG] Reminder: Videofest at UTS this Saturday

2006-08-08 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
*SLUG Videofest* Start: 2006-08-12 10:30 End: 2006-08-12 18:30 Location: UTS CB02.06.42; Building 2, Level 6, Rom 642 Description: We will experiment some with video technology on Linux and discuss what resources we will need in order to have video technology happen at Software Freedom Day in S

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Craig Dibble wrote: > Er, sorry to nitpick, but 993 is actually IMAP SSL. Aw man, you're picking nits that are sitting on the nit that Steve already picked. You're almost picking meta-nits. Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo +---

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Craig Dibble
Jamie Wilkinson wrote: This one time, at band camp, Steve Kowalik wrote: On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:12:37 +1000, Jamie Wilkinson uttered Port 993 is POP3S, whereas SSMTP is port 465. That'll learn me for just making things up... but the important part is that it's not port 25 and thus not likely

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Steve Kowalik wrote: >On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:12:37 +1000, Jamie Wilkinson uttered >> 2. find someone who can host a SMTP AUTH outbound on port 993 (SMTP+SSL) >> which probably won't get blocked by any of your ISPs outbound. > >Port 993 is POP3S, whereas SSMTP is port 46

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:12:37 +1000, Jamie Wilkinson uttered > 2. find someone who can host a SMTP AUTH outbound on port 993 (SMTP+SSL) > which probably won't get blocked by any of your ISPs outbound. Port 993 is POP3S, whereas SSMTP is port 465. Cheers, --

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Peter Miller wrote: >On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 11:22 +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:40AM +1000, Peter Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> wrote: >> > Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its sendmail >> > configured proper

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Ian Wienand
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:58:45AM +1000, Peter Miller wrote: > In my case, the value of YOUR_ISP_UPSTREAM_MAILSERVER depends on which > firewall I'm behind, since all the ISPs in question gate client > connections as being from their own customers' IP addresses, not the > whole Internet. So one s

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Peter Miller
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 11:22 +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:40AM +1000, Peter Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its sendmail > > configured properly? In all the cases I have to deal with, my laptop i

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:40AM +1000, Peter Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Oh, drat, dang, darn, shoot. My home static IP address is banned by CBL > for invalid HELO parameters. I couldn't even email this to slug. > > > Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its se

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Peter Chubb
> "Peter" == Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> drat, dang, darn, shoot. My home Peter> static IP address is banned by CBL for invalid HELO parameters. Peter> I couldn't even email this to slug. The way I solve this is to run a MTA on my laptop that connects via TLS to a smartho

[SLUG] [ot] Someone to value code using cocomo

2006-08-08 Thread Richard Hayes
Dear list, I have used some MIT licensed code in a new product I am developing and I need to value it using cocomo.(II) My advisers tell me to get it valued by a consultant with Professional indemnity insurance. Personally. I use SLOCCOUNT but I need an independent valuation. Please conta

Re: [SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Steve Lindsay
On 8/9/06, Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I googled for this problem, but I had no luck in finding anything specific, only very general stuff for desktop machines that don't wander between networks. Not the answer you're looking for but have you thought about using some sort of webm

[SLUG] DHCP client vs sendmail

2006-08-08 Thread Peter Miller
Oh, drat, dang, darn, shoot. My home static IP address is banned by CBL for invalid HELO parameters. I couldn't even email this to slug. Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its sendmail configured properly? In all the cases I have to deal with, my laptop is a DHCP client

[SLUG] Re: [ProgSoc] ls: .: Permission denied

2006-08-08 Thread Anand Kumria
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:11:06PM +1000, Michael Brown wrote: > > I'm trying to run ls as root on the pop3 > server (which is also the NIS master) and it gets denied, but running as > root on the actual fileserver that shares out the nfs mount works fine. Perhaps you nfs_root_squash on? The iss

Re: [SLUG] Re: How do I automount CF card when PCMCIA adapter inserted?

2006-08-08 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I'm not suggesting 'throw the baby out with the bathwater' but over and > over everywhere you look kde is more polished than gnome ... I don't think "everywhere" is true at all, but particular examples are good, because the offer the opportunity of explanation. > Recently I asked this list ho

Re: [SLUG] Re: How do I automount CF card when PCMCIA adapter inserted?

2006-08-08 Thread jam
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 14:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > John Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered the following thing: > > > Would someone please point me in the right direction? > > > > If you're fairly desktop-agnostic, you can try reverting to Kubuntu. I > > Last time I used KDE I wasn't too

Re: [SLUG] ls: .: Permission denied

2006-08-08 Thread Michael Brown
>If you post the appropriate "ls -l" output as well as your mount statements from /etc/fstab it might help us diagnose the problem.OK, magpie is the NIS mater/pop3 server and wombat is the file server magpie:/# ls -la /home/fredls: /home/fred: Permission deniedmagpie:/# ls -la /home/total 132drwxr-

Re: [SLUG] Highpoint Rocket raid - RHEL4

2006-08-08 Thread Shane Machon
Hi Kenneth, I dont have too much experience with the highpoint raid cards, from my understanding they are not 'true' raid cards, they still rely on alot of CPU overhead to run (well this is the case with some motherboard onboard controllers, not sure of the dedicated PCI versions). I use the 3war