one of my servers has developed a habit of dying (3rd time in 3 weeks).
I'm guessing hardware - memory?? something else?? This box has been
running for a couple of years.
Symptoms are different each time, and each time there is nothing obvious
in the log, but this was a photo of the death
On 16/02/11 22:44, david wrote:
one of my servers has developed a habit of dying (3rd time in 3
weeks). I'm guessing hardware - memory?? something else?? This box has
been running for a couple of years.
Symptoms are different each time, and each time there is nothing
obvious in the log, but
Hi Slug,
I'd be grateful if someone could show me how to interpret this tcp dump
pls. It is a sample from an attempt to renew a dhcp lease and update
the dns journals. But the dns jounrals are not being updated, apparently
due to the error not authorized. I just don't understand why not.
Hi Kyle,
just a general question on your setup there...
what sort of setup do you have regarding your internet connection?
Is it a fairly typical home ADSL2+ modem with an account with an ISP? If
so which one?
O are you a corporate with a Telstra or Optus router? Or something like
that?
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 07:56:55PM +1100, Kyle wrote:
Sorry for the late reply; I've been busy.
I have always used BIND with rndc.key and it used to work. What's then
the difference between nsupdate and rndc and using BIND?
They have two quite different functions. nsupdate is used to
Ben,
std internode ADSL2+
I get about 15.8MB (or Mb ??) down.
Why ??
Kind Regards
Kyle
On 17/02/11 1:26 PM, Ben Donohue wrote:
Hi Kyle,
just a general question on your setup there...
what sort of setup do you have
Hi Kyle,
Do you have a static IP?
Have you set your modem up to forward DNS queries to internode DNS
primary and secondary?
Are you hosting your own domains?
If so, is your internal server setup as the primary name server for your
own domains or are you using a third party DNS service or
Ok, thanks John.
I've tried lots since this thread started to the extent I installed a
whole fresh machine on 192 subnet only, skimmed dhcpd and named confs
down to a simple, by the book, 1 domain setup and I still get the same
problem even on the fresh host. And this is a CentOS 5.5 (final)
Ben,
answers inline.
Kind Regards
Kyle
On 17/02/11 1:38 PM, Ben Donohue wrote:
Hi Kyle,
Do you have a static IP?
## Yes.
Have you set your modem up to forward DNS queries to internode DNS
primary and secondary?
Ok, since it is not working how it is now... then perhaps you'll try the
following...
setup your modem to point to internode DNS servers for DNS queries.
Point your internal DNS server to point to the MODEM for upstream DNS
queries.
Don't set it up as DDNS. Just forwarding DNS to the next
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:38:58PM +1100, Kyle wrote:
I've tried lots since this thread started to the extent I installed a
whole fresh machine on 192 subnet only, skimmed dhcpd and named confs
down to a simple, by the book, 1 domain setup and I still get the same
problem even on the
John,
Answers inline.
Kind Regards
Kyle
On 17/02/11 2:00 PM, John Clarke wrote:
Are you having problems updating the A record or the PTR record, or
both?
## Both. DHCP is simply not updating DNS journals when a lease
Kyle == Kyle k...@attitia.com writes:
Kyle John, Answers inline.
Kyle
Kyle Kind Regards
Kyle Kyle
Kyle On 17/02/11 2:00 PM, John Clarke wrote:
Are you having problems updating the A record or the PTR record, or
Ben,
I'll be happy to try that, but I'd like to understand your thinking
please. Can you clarify it for me please?
From what I can tell from your process below, it appears you want to
send a request to update an internal DNS server with an internal
client's records (for viewing by other
Peter,
exactly!! THAT IS MY ISSUE I believe. But I have not yet found a log to
give me sufficient info to nut out WHY.
All my config files are presently up for the world to see at;
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30159
And from what I've read (LOTS in the last
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 02:48:45PM +1100, Kyle wrote:
Can you manually update either or both with nsupdate run on the DNS
server.
## No, nsupdate extract from last email was run on the dns server.
OK, so if this doesn't work, then the DHCP server won't be able to do it
either. You need to
John,
'domain1.com' is obfuscated from the real value. But rest assured I am
being painstakingly anal in ensuring the values are the same including
the 'key name' in named and dhcpd being exactly the same as used in the
dnssec-keygen command.
transcript of interaction. Long story short,
Hi
My kingdom to anyone who can id the parts U15 and U16
They are marked '44108' 'SA1delta' 'W97k'
http://tigger.ws/downloads/img_1329.jpg
Why this is not wildly OT:
I'm making these POS (Micros 2010) run linux.
The CashDraw solonoid takes a diode to +V, the IC to somewhere to control it
and a
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 04:37:48PM +1100, Kyle wrote:
'domain1.com' is obfuscated from the real value. But rest assured I am
being painstakingly anal in ensuring the values are the same including
the 'key name' in named and dhcpd being exactly the same as used in the
dnssec-keygen
19 matches
Mail list logo
