Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-18 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Brad Thomson wrote: Run the hell away - NOW. We're migrating back to Exchange from InsightConnector because it's so useless - and going after our supplier for a refund on the basis of fitness. Unstable, useless, lack of support... it's gotta make you wonder why

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-18 Thread David Kempe
I've only recently started looking at these sorts of things, we should keep in touch to share experiences. I'm keen to be in the loop here as well. This has been an issue that has plagued me for a while now. We need iCal support in Evolution, a Windows version of Evolution, and a good iCal

[SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Brad Thomson
Does anyone have Bynari's Insight server, connector and LDAP client running in a production environment? I'm looking to replace a small (50 seat) Exchange server with something on Linux, and would be intrested in hearing from those that have used something other than Bynari for this purpose,

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Gonzalo Servat
On 18/02/2003 9:10 AM +1100 Brad Thomson wrote: Does anyone have Bynari's Insight server, connector and LDAP client running in a production environment? I'm looking to replace a small (50 seat) Exchange server with something on Linux, and would be intrested in hearing from those that have used

RE: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Rowling, Jill
) 9663-1412 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Servat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 11:06 To: Brad Thomson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server On 18/02/2003 9:10 AM +1100 Brad Thomson wrote: Does

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Stuart Guthrie
Are you proposing Windows clients? If you've got a few months there will hopefully be an open source calendar server using CAP (see http://www.calsch.org) that plugs into evolution. http://www.sourceforge/projects/jical Stu On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 09:10, Brad Thomson wrote: Does anyone

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread mlh
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:10:00AM +1100, Brad Thomson wrote: I'm looking to replace a small (50 seat) Exchange server with something on Linux, and would be intrested in hearing from those that have used something other than Bynari for this purpose, too. A sometimes mentioned alternative to

RE: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Rowling, Jill
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:10:00AM +1100, Brad Thomson wrote: I'm looking to replace a small (50 seat) Exchange server with something on Linux, and would be intrested in hearing from those that have used something other than Bynari

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Ken Foskey
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 09:10, Brad Thomson wrote: Does anyone have Bynari's Insight server, connector and LDAP client running in a production environment? I'm looking to replace a small (50 seat) Exchange server with something on Linux, and would be intrested in hearing from those that have

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Brad Thomson wrote: Does anyone have Bynari's Insight server, connector and LDAP client running in a production environment? Run the hell away - NOW. We're migrating back to Exchange from InsightConnector because it's so useless - and going after our supplier for a refund

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Gonzalo Servat wrote: I contacted Bynari and they basically said their client is too unstable to be used in production (sounds like a great idea to advertise a product with a price tag on it when you know it's unstable, don't you?) And as an added bonus, their support

RE: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Rowling, Jill wrote: However Bynari's Insight can apparently handle a few thousand clients without apparent performance degradation. Then again the hardware cost would be awesome. InsightConnector doesn't need a Z390 behind it - it just *can* use it if you've got a spare

RE: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Marty Richards
If it simply email why not an imap server (Hope I have this right). The IMAP server side is great. The problems are with the clients - Outlook and IMAP is ugly for a dozen reasons. Has anyone met a Windoze mail client which works nicely with IMAP servers? (think sent items, drafts, deletion

RE: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Gonzalo Servat
On 18/02/2003 2:04 PM +1100 Marty Richards wrote: If it simply email why not an imap server (Hope I have this right). The IMAP server side is great. The problems are with the clients - Outlook and IMAP is ugly for a dozen reasons. Has anyone met a Windoze mail client which works nicely with

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Brad Thomson
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:55:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Brad Thomson wrote: Does anyone have Bynari's Insight server, connector and LDAP client running in a production environment? Run the hell away - NOW. We're migrating back to Exchange from

RE: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Stuart Guthrie
Mozilla for Windows? Does IMAP. Used to use it until Evolution came along. Stu On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 14:22, Gonzalo Servat wrote: On 18/02/2003 2:04 PM +1100 Marty Richards wrote: If it simply email why not an imap server (Hope I have this right). The IMAP server side is great. The

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread Graham Smith
Just a though has any one tried or looked at SuSE Linux Openexchange Server http://www.suse.de/en/business/products/suse_business/openexchange/index.html -- Regards, Graham Smith - -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/

Re: [SLUG] Bynari's Insight Server

2003-02-17 Thread David Kempe
The IMAP server side is great. The problems are with the clients - Outlook and IMAP is ugly for a dozen reasons. Has anyone met a Windoze mail client which works nicely with IMAP servers? (think sent items, drafts, deletion procedures, address books etc). the only client that has triumphed