To all who replied thanks.
As I stated in an earlier post I was on Meds at the time I originally
posted.
Seems that I mixed up the monitor deatails - confused re various models
that I was investigating and what I eventually purchased.
Purchased a BenQ G2400WD
Specs at http://www.benq.com/p
2009/5/15 Kevin Shackleton :
> On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 18:36 +0800, Dion wrote:
>> Actually its a 16:10 ratio.
>
> Terminology is curious.
>
> Did anyone do the arithmetic? 1920/1080 = 1.8 = 16/9
>
> However, that doesn't say anything about if items in a scene look blocky
> or skinny - that depe
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 18:36 +0800, Dion wrote:
> Actually its a 16:10 ratio.
Terminology is curious.
Did anyone do the arithmetic? 1920/1080 = 1.8 = 16/9
However, that doesn't say anything about if items in a scene look blocky
or skinny - that depends on the ratio of the length and width of
bill wrote:
This AM drove to Alexandria and visited Allans Music ( waste of time)
and had intended to visit Harris Technology (gone) which used to be
next door.
On way home I spied a small computer shop (also in Alexandria) which
happened to have a BenQ E2400WD in stock, unopened. Pric quoted
> Came home and plugged it in to my KVM switch via VGA and both PCs (
> Kubuntu 8.10 and Xbuntu 7.10) found it immediately at the correct
> resolution of 1920 x 1200 - plus he Monitor is 16:9 and 1080p.
So, if the correct resolution is 1920x1200 then the monitor is not 16:9 and
1080p. :-)
- Jef
2009/5/14 bill :
> This AM drove to Alexandria and visited Allans Music ( waste of time) and
> had intended to visit Harris Technology (gone) which used to be next door.
>
> On way home I spied a small computer shop (also in Alexandria) which
> happened to have a BenQ E2400WD in stock, unopened. Pr
This AM drove to Alexandria and visited Allans Music ( waste of time)
and had intended to visit Harris Technology (gone) which used to be next
door.
On way home I spied a small computer shop (also in Alexandria) which
happened to have a BenQ E2400WD in stock, unopened. Pric quoted was
$345, $