Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-04 Thread Jon and Hannah
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:36:07 pm you wrote: I think it is going to come back and bite the Linux community if we go via the line that we are immune to viruses, like Apple users have done for many years. Wasn't there a virus for unix systems a few years ago that slowed almost the entire internet

Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Jon and Hannah wrote: On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:36:07 pm you wrote: I think it is going to come back and bite the Linux community if we go via the line that we are immune to viruses, like Apple users have done for many years. Wasn't there a virus for unix systems a few years ago that slowed

Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-04 Thread Troy Rollo
On Monday 04 April 2011 21:14:51 Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Jon and Hannah wrote: On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:36:07 pm you wrote: I think it is going to come back and bite the Linux community if we go via the line that we are immune to viruses, like Apple users have done for many years.

[SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-03 Thread Richard Ibbotson
On Sunday 03 April 2011 11:41:34 Chris Allen wrote: What is the current consensus on using a virus scanner for Linux (specifically Ubuntu 10.10)? When I last asked this (about 2 years ago) the general opinion was, waste of time, Linux did' need it If scanners are recommended now, which is the

Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-03 Thread Morgan Storey
I think it is going to come back and bite the Linux community if we go via the line that we are immune to viruses, like Apple users have done for many years. Now there are Mac viruses appearing and a mac botnet. Clamav and common sense can go a long way, don't install or run things from an unknown

Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Morgan Storey wrote: I think it is going to come back and bite the Linux community if we go via the line that we are immune to viruses, Unfortunately, the alternative, virus scanners that look for particular virus signatures is nothing more than security theatre. Firstly, inew viruses can be

Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-03 Thread Morgan Storey
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo mle+s...@mega-nerd.com wrote: Morgan Storey wrote: I think it is going to come back and bite the Linux community if we go via the line that we are immune to viruses, Unfortunately, the alternative, virus scanners that look for particular

Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-03 Thread Nick Andrew
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:46:36AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Morgan Storey wrote: I think it is going to come back and bite the Linux community if we go via the line that we are immune to viruses, Unfortunately, the alternative, virus scanners that look for particular virus

Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
I am subscribed to this list. Please don't CC me when replying. Morgan Storey wrote: Yes polymorphic viruses have been around a long time, but look at say the 100 biggest infectors at the moment, none of them I would say are polymorphic, all of them can be picked up by signatures. And all

Re: [SLUG] Re: Virus Scanner

2011-04-03 Thread Peter Hardy
To answer OP's question, my Linux mail server uses spamassassin and ESET for filtering. My Linux file server also periodically performs full scans with ESET. I do not yet run any virus scanning on my desktop though. On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:30 +1000, Nick Andrew wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at