[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo

sinfo -lNe | grep idle | cut -d " " -f 1 On 25 May 2017 at 03:02, A wrote: > Couldnt find this in the man, > > Whats the syntax for listing which nodes are free (not allocated/mixed), > with sinfo?

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo

On 25/05/17 05:12, Will French wrote: > We have an alias setup that shows free and allocated nodes grouped by feature: > > sinfo --format="%55N %.35f %.6a %.10A" Nice, here's an alternative that is more useful in our setup which groups nodes by reason and GRES. sinfo --format="%60N %.15G

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo

We have an alias setup that shows free and allocated nodes grouped by feature: sinfo --format="%55N %.35f %.6a %.10A" > On May 24, 2017, at 2:04 PM, A wrote: > > Couldnt find this in the man, > > Whats the syntax for listing which nodes are free (not allocated/mixed),

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo

thanks! On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Ole Holm Nielsen < ole.h.niel...@fysik.dtu.dk> wrote: > > On 24-05-2017 21:03, A wrote: > >> Couldnt find this in the man, >> >> Whats the syntax for listing which nodes are free (not allocated/mixed), >> with sinfo? >> > > sinfo -t idle >

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo man page

On 08/11/16 11:42, Lachlan Musicman wrote: > > %CNumber of CPUs by state in the format > "allocated/idle/other/total". Do not use this with a node state > option ("%t" or "%T") or the different node states will be placed on > separate lines. > > I presume I am doing something wrong? I

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo man page

Arg, I see now (hit send too soon). My parsing of the man page was wrong. cheers L. -- The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always done it this way." - Grace Hopper On 8 November 2016 at 11:39, Lachlan Musicman wrote: > Priority: Minor > > I notice that

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo like behavior from scontrol

: Thomas M. Payerle [mailto:paye...@umd.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 12:07 PM To: slurm-dev <slurm-dev@schedmd.com> Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo like behavior from scontrol Something like sacctmgr show user withassoc -p user=USERNAME --noheader | awk -F'|' '{ print $6}' shoul

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo like behavior from scontrol

Something like sacctmgr show user withassoc -p user=USERNAME --noheader | awk -F'|' '{ print $6}' should give you what you want. On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Eggleston, Nicholas J. wrote: I?ve got kind of a weird question for you all. I?m in a place where I need to know a list of all the

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo manpage error?

Documentation updated. see: https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/3e5864b6486bbd95ceacd695a503f85b3c0c4b8c Quoting Uwe Sauter uwe.sauter...@gmail.com: Hi all, taken from the current 14.03.7 version of the sinfo manpage: snip -o output_format, --format=output_format

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo manpage error?

Hi Moe, thank you. Can this format specifier also be used in the job name field? Best, Uwe Am 16.09.2014 18:27, schrieb je...@schedmd.com: Documentation updated. see: https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/3e5864b6486bbd95ceacd695a503f85b3c0c4b8c Quoting Uwe Sauter

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo -R doesn't print one node once (version 14.03.4)

Thanks, that's definitely a more general solution. On 06/18/2014 05:39 PM, je...@schedmd.com wrote: Thank you for the patch. A somewhat more general solution to this problem will be in version 14.03.5 and can be found here:

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo -R doesn't print one node once (version 14.03.4)

Sorry, my previous post was truncated. diff --git a/src/sinfo/sinfo.c b/src/sinfo/sinfo.c index 15a17dc..0643f62 100644 --- a/src/sinfo/sinfo.c +++ b/src/sinfo/sinfo.c @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@ static int _build_sinfo_data(List sinfo_list, sinfo_cnt++;

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo -R doesn't print one node once (version 14.03.4)

Thank you for the patch. A somewhat more general solution to this problem will be in version 14.03.5 and can be found here: https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/5351d393a67809371f14a40ca8bb4e85f0c64018 Quoting Didier GAZEN didier.ga...@aero.obs-mip.fr: Sorry, my previous post was

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received

. - Mail original - De: Moe Jette je...@schedmd.com À: slurm-dev slurm-dev@schedmd.com Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 18:46:53 Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received That means your slurmctld is older than the command you

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received

2013 16:42:11 Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received It doesn't appear your slurmctld is running or responsive. p.gamb...@ulg.ac.be wrote: Hello, I obtain the following error message when I try to use SLURM. root@kosmos

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received

. The problem seems to come from there. Philippe - Mail original - De: Moe Jette je...@schedmd.com À: slurm-dev slurm-dev@schedmd.com Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 17:29:53 Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received The command

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received

...@schedmd.com À: slurm-dev slurm-dev@schedmd.com Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 17:29:53 Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received The command and daemon are not communicating. Check your slurmctld log file. There is also a troubleshooting guide

[slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received

of slurmctld? - Mail original - De: Moe Jette je...@schedmd.com À: slurm-dev slurm-dev@schedmd.com Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 18:46:53 Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received That means your slurmctld is older than the command you