On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Christian Franke
wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Christian Franke
>> wrote:
>>> David Rees wrote:
Seems to be missing a lot of SMART attributes that the older Indilinx
drives have. See attached for smartctl -a output.
>>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Christian Franke
wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
>>
>> Seems to be missing a lot of SMART attributes that the older Indilinx
>> drives have. See attached for smartctl -a output.
>
> This device does not use the Indilinx specific format which use the VALUE
> and WORST b
David Rees wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Christian Franke
> wrote:
>> David Rees wrote:
>>> Seems to be missing a lot of SMART attributes that the older Indilinx
>>> drives have. See attached for smartctl -a output.
>> This device does not use the Indilinx specific format which use t
David Rees wrote:
> Seems to be missing a lot of SMART attributes that the older Indilinx
> drives have. See attached for smartctl -a output.
This device does not use the Indilinx specific format which use the
VALUE and WORST bytes to build a 64-bit RAW value. Is this actually an
old firmware o
Seems to be missing a lot of SMART attributes that the older Indilinx
drives have. See attached for smartctl -a output.
-Dave
smartctl 5.40 2010-10-16 r3189 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
=== START OF INFORMATION
