On 1/28/16 2:44 , Fred Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone who has ever tried performance benchmarking between LX and KVM.
> In my dirty-and-quick test(compling gcc), LX is 20% slower than KVM. It is
> sort of disspointed!
Are you performing active benchmarking and on the latest platform? This
is a
I am having problems using vmadm send to a remote host when I have a zone
configured with the ‘delegate_dataset’ flag. It looks like it doesn’t transfer
the delegated fs so it ends up throwing errors.
Is this something that will be supported in the future?
I have a few zones with this flag,
> I am having problems using vmadm send to a remote host when I have a zone
> configured with the ‘delegate_dataset’ flag. It looks like it doesn’t
> transfer the delegated fs so it ends up throwing errors.
>
> Is this something that will be supported in the future?
>
Hi Anil,
The vmadm
From memory (I don't do it often)
vmadm send UUID | ssh host vmadm recv
... let it fail ...
zfs send -R zones/UUID/data | ssh host zfs recv
ssh host vmadm install UUID
From what I remember it fails on the (internal only) install step on the
vmadm recv due to the dataset being missing, you
the outsider wrote:
Dear all,
Many thanks to all that helped yesterday and tonight for restoring my
server.
Everything works fine now, but I have some unanswered questions. Maybe
someone can shed some light on this.
Since I ran into trouble after updating my USB drive with the latest
Dear all,
Many thanks to all that helped yesterday and tonight for restoring my
server.
Everything works fine now, but I have some unanswered questions. Maybe
someone can shed some light on this.
Since I ran into trouble after updating my USB drive with the latest SmartOS
version some
I will try to answer what I can, most is just based on my personal
experience:
Upgrading:
The script you linked is fine, I wrote something close to that a while
ago. Aside from it taken 10-15min to write the new files on the USB I
have had not issues with doing it that way.
There is a page
Hi,
Anyone who has ever tried performance benchmarking between LX and KVM.
In my dirty-and-quick test(compling gcc), LX is 20% slower than KVM. It is sort
of disspointed!
Thanks.
Fred
---
smartos-discuss
Archives:
