On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 2:07 PM, John Levon
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:58:16PM +0100, Michal Nowak wrote:
>
>> Just filed: https://github.com/joyent/smartos-live/issues/768
>>
>> I think I should test if it also fails on EHCI and with latest non-KPTI
>>
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:58:16PM +0100, Michal Nowak wrote:
> Just filed: https://github.com/joyent/smartos-live/issues/768
>
> I think I should test if it also fails on EHCI and with latest non-KPTI
> SmartOS image.
That would be very useful.
Also, can you try adding to the end of the grub
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 10:29 AM, John Levon
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 07:21:45am +0100, Michal Nowak wrote:
>
>> >>https://us-east.manta.joyent.com/arekinath/public/kpti/20180221T003551Z/platform-20180221T003551Z.tgz
>>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 07:21:45am +0100, Michal Nowak wrote:
> >>https://us-east.manta.joyent.com/arekinath/public/kpti/20180221T003551Z/platform-20180221T003551Z.tgz
> >>https://us-east.manta.joyent.com/arekinath/public/kpti/20180221T003551Z/platform-20180221T003551Z.iso
>
On 03/01/18 07:13 AM, Michal Nowak wrote:
On 02/23/2018 03:17 AM, Alex Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
Same deal as before, I would like to solicit testers for a DEBUG image
of KPTI with PCID support this time. I am particularly interested in
anyone who has a Nehalem or Westmere era Xeon to try this one
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 07:13:39AM +0100, Michal Nowak wrote:
>When on Linux KVM I was able to run many tests from Phoronix Test Suite
>(from pkgsrc) - they all passed, could not break it (sorry :) ). I'll
>do the same on bare metal this week.
Thanks for the testing Michal!
regards
On 02/23/2018 03:17 AM, Alex Wilson wrote:Hi all,
Same deal as before, I would like to solicit testers for a DEBUG image
of KPTI with PCID support this time. I am particularly interested in
anyone who has a Nehalem or Westmere era Xeon to try this one out, as
well as anyone who can put
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:26:04pm +0200, Jussi Sallinen wrote:
> On 23/02/2018 9.08, Jussi Sallinen wrote:
>
> >I’ll be able to run tests on X5500 system (Fire X4170) during the weekend,
> >if I’m not mistaking it’s Nehalem based.
>
> The KPTI debug build seems to run fine on X5500 based
On 23/02/2018 9.08, Jussi Sallinen wrote:
I’ll be able to run tests on X5500 system (Fire X4170) during the weekend, if
I’m not mistaking it’s Nehalem based.
The KPTI debug build seems to run fine on X5500 based system even under
load, so far no crashes when testing with CPU/IO/Disk bound
Just got it booted on on my dual Xeon Ivy Bridge.
Probably won't get to put a whole lot of load on it though.
---
~ sjorge
On 2018-02-23 08:08, Jussi Sallinen wrote:
On 23 Feb 2018, at 4.17, Alex Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
Same deal as before, I would like to solicit
On 23 Feb 2018, at 4.17, Alex Wilson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Same deal as before, I would like to solicit testers for a DEBUG image
> of KPTI with PCID support this time. I am particularly interested in
> anyone who has a Nehalem or Westmere era Xeon to try this one out,
Hi all,
Same deal as before, I would like to solicit testers for a DEBUG image
of KPTI with PCID support this time. I am particularly interested in
anyone who has a Nehalem or Westmere era Xeon to try this one out, as
well as anyone who can put significant load on it. Quite a few of the
bugs
12 matches
Mail list logo