Re: Issues creating webapps snaps with stric confinement

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Vincent JOBARD wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that's a proxy issue since the webapps works well at home. Is > there a way to use a webapp through a proxy by the way ? webapp-launcher, being based on oxide, should be proxy-aware if the

Re: pro tip: use scriptlets instead of custom plugins

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Kyle Fazzari <kyle.fazz...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Feb 20, 2017 6:23 AM, "Olivier Tilloy" <olivier.til...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Leo Arias <leo.ar...@canonical.com> wrote: >> H

Re: pro tip: use scriptlets instead of custom plugins

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Leo Arias wrote: > Hello! > > This week I've been cleaning a few of my old snaps, using some of the > new features in more recent versions of snapcraft. At first I wasn't > convinced about scriptlets, but now I think they are great. Take

Re: ubuntu-app-platform updated to Qt 5.6.2

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Leo Arias <leo.ar...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Olivier Tilloy > <olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote: >> This is a bit tricky: when packaging a Qt application that uses the >> platform snap, snapcraft w

Re: ubuntu-app-platform updated to Qt 5.6.2

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Timo Jyrinki wrote: > 2017-01-31 10:23 GMT+02:00 Alberto Mardegan : >> Do we have a clear understanding of why this happens? Qt apps are >> supposed to be binary compatible against newer releases. >> One

Re: SDL2 / Kivy keyboard event not firing in Snap

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Michael Hall <mhall...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On 01/24/2017 08:47 AM, Alan Pope wrote: >> On 24 January 2017 at 10:22, Olivier Tilloy >> <olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> That sounds very similar to the issue I was havin

Re: Creating a snap using make or autotools

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Luther Goh Lu Feng wrote: > This probably isn't the right place to ask, but I thought I should ask in > case it does matter in the context of snapping: when creating a snap of say, > a hello world program in C[1], should I use the make or

Re: Snapcraft 2.25 has been released.

"hello-xiaoguo", and your apps are named "env", "evil", "sh", "hello-world", "createfile", "createfiletohome", "writetocommon". There is no app named "hello-xiaoguo", so your example is not affected by https://launchp

Re: SDL2 / Kivy keyboard event not firing in Snap

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Aaron Hampton wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use Kivy ( https://kivy.org/#home ) inside a snap. It mostly > works, but some SDL2 events don't occur. If I run the application from > outside of a snap the events do happen. > > Specifically,

Re: Snapcraft 2.25 has been released.

d > the apps are launched well. > > By the way, I have created a blog for it at > http://blog.csdn.net/ubuntutouch/article/details/54691673. It has the > captured pictures. > > Thanks & best regards, > XiaoGuo > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Olivier Tilloy > <oliv

Re: Snapcraft 2.25 has been released.

entries now don't need to be replicated in `prime`. > - cleaning all parts works correctly even if `snapcraft.yaml` is broken. > > ## Others > For the full list of things available on 2.25 feel free to check > https://launchpad.net/snapcraft/+milestone/2.25 > > # Contribution

Re: Snapcraft 2.25 has been released.

classic confined snap >> are not met. >> >> ## parts >> Improvements were made to the core parts management of snapcraft: >> >> - `stage` entries now don't need to be replicated in `prime`. >> - cleaning all parts works correctly even if `snapcraft.yaml`

stable 0ad snap

Hi all, I’m happy to announce there's a stable snap in the store for 0ad, the real-time strategy game of ancient warfare (Alpha 21 Ulysses): https://uappexplorer.com/app/play0ad.osomon. The snap is available for i386 and amd64, and requires manual connection of the process-control interface

Re: snapd and semaphores

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 13:39 +0100, Olivier Tilloy wrote: >> >> Here is the bug report: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653955 > > Thanks! The fix is in master and will bi in snapd 2.21. Excel

Re: snapd and semaphores

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 16:34 +0100, Olivier Tilloy wrote: >> Hi everyone, and happy new year! >> >> I’m snapping an app that makes use of semaphores¹ and seeing an >> apparmor

snapd and semaphores

Hi everyone, and happy new year! I’m snapping an app that makes use of semaphores¹ and seeing an apparmor denial. The glibc implementation of sem_open calls SHM_GET_NAME(EINVAL,SEM_FAILED,SEM_SHM_PREFIX) where SEM_SHM_PREFIX is "sem.", so it tries to create /dev/shm/sem.{name}, which fails

Re: WIP snap for 0ad

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On 15/12/16 07:15, Olivier Tilloy wrote: >> I haven’t gotten any further information. 2.18 is in zesty, (when) >> will it be backported to xenial/yakkety? > > > I think the push i

Re: WIP snap for 0ad

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 15:33 +0100, Olivier Tilloy wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, 20

Re: WIP snap for 0ad

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Leo Arias wrote: > The alpha? > I want to play! Here you go: http://people.canonical.com/~osomon/play0ad_0.0.21-alpha_amd64.snap. This is a 891MB file, sha1sum: 7a3a7af8d6295703fc89a795f8569fd5b9584f29 Once installed (with --dangerous),

Re: WIP snap for 0ad

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 13:13 +0100, Olivier Tilloy wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I’ve been working on snapping up 0ad¹ as a side project, and I’m at >> the point where I’ve got it to r

Re: Setting release version in snapcraft build

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > Readding the list > > > El 01/09/16 a las 14:27, Casey Marshall escribió: > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Sergio Schvezov > wrote: >> >> El 01/09/16 a las 14:05, Casey