Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-12 Thread XiaoGuo Liu
Will the new release address the issue at https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bug/1662464? Currently, I am using ogra's packageproxy, and it works perfectly. I created a blog at http://blog.csdn.net/ubuntutouch/article/details/54405477 However, nodejs is not a debian package. Instead, it

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-12 Thread Michi Henning
> > While I don't disagree with the suggestions here, if I may suggest a > workaround: > > If you find yourself using cleanbuild a lot (it makes a new ephemeral > container, builds, then destroys the container), you might find some > workflow improvements by simply developing the snap in a

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-12 Thread Michi Henning
I’ve opened a bug here for the overlay build: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664100 Michi. > On 10 Feb 2017, at 9:12 , Leo Arias wrote: > > Hello, > > We have a few cleanbuild bugs open: >

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-09 Thread Leo Arias
Hello, We have a few cleanbuild bugs open: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bugs?field.tag=cleanbuild Some of them are related to what you are asking, so I would appreciate if you go in there and add your comments with the ideal solution for your use case. If you don't find any bug that

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-09 Thread Kyle Fazzari
On 02/09/2017 12:02 PM, Alan Pope wrote: > Hi Kyle (and Sergio!) > > On 9 February 2017 at 18:45, Kyle Fazzari wrote: >> If you find yourself using cleanbuild a lot (it makes a new ephemeral >> container, builds, then destroys the container), you might find some >>

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-09 Thread Alan Pope
Hi Kyle (and Sergio!) On 9 February 2017 at 18:45, Kyle Fazzari wrote: > If you find yourself using cleanbuild a lot (it makes a new ephemeral > container, builds, then destroys the container), you might find some > workflow improvements by simply developing the snap

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-09 Thread Kyle Fazzari
On 02/05/2017 11:46 PM, Michi Henning wrote: >> Would it make sense to extend the snapcraft yaml to let the developer >> specify where build-packages and stage-packages should be taken from? >> >> It would be nice to be able to run a "snapcraft cleanbuild" from zesty >> while effectively using

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-05 Thread Michi Henning
> Would it make sense to extend the snapcraft yaml to let the developer > specify where build-packages and stage-packages should be taken from? > > It would be nice to be able to run a "snapcraft cleanbuild" from zesty > while effectively using all the packages from xenial+overlay... :-) That

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-05 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 06/02/2017 09:53, Michi Henning wrote: > I’m trying to get thumbnailer to build with snapcraft cleanbuild. > > We depend on cmake-extras for the build. I’ve added that to the > build-packages list. The version of cmake that gets installed is 0.6, but we > need the latest 1.0. > > Is it

Package too old for cleanbuild

2017-02-05 Thread Michi Henning
I’m trying to get thumbnailer to build with snapcraft cleanbuild. We depend on cmake-extras for the build. I’ve added that to the build-packages list. The version of cmake that gets installed is 0.6, but we need the latest 1.0. Is it possible to add the overlay PPA to cleanbuild somehow? If