[sniffer] Re: Rules for Large International ISPs

Well, I guess I will ruffle someones feathers again with my response here, but like your oringial message, I think we need to be honest here. This is not a message sniffer 'popularity' contest after all, we are paying customers and need to ensure SNF causes no False Postives. Over the last few

[sniffer] Re: MDaemon plug-in - Process inline during SMTP?

Hi Pete. If you need any testers for this plugin, give me a shout. -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:07 PM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: MDaemon plug-in - Process

[sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping'

As a user of your MD plugin since it's Beta release, it has worked perfectly. SA can have problems with completely unrelated rules / tests should there be a syntax error in any one of SA's CF files. I'd suggest using ONLY the default SA installation rules to test, and/or running all CF

[sniffer] Error posting?

Why am I getting the following error when replying to a message here? It certainly is NOT automatic... and has never happened before today. --- Failed to deliver to 'sniffer@sortmonster.com' LIST module(list sniffer@sortmonster.com) reports: an automatically-generated message cannot be posted

[sniffer] Re: Sharon Daniels is out of the office.

I think we all get the point after how many of these now? Pete anyway to remove this address or fix the listserver to ignor? -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:54 PM To: Message

RE: [sniffer] Rollback of bot rules..

My bet is that either OB or WS trees of SURBL are the culprit. I've seen false postives from them before. Can your bot isolate the subs of the multi lookup and only use the more reliable ones like JP, SC, etc? Also, these are dynamic services and can change at any time... Sometimes in minutes.

RE: [sniffer] About Resellers, and the best laid plans of mice men...

Like others, I received the same special offer email off list. I've never heard of ComputerHouse. IMO, resellers should not be using this list to solicit business, either through a list posting or soliciting individual posters. I would think that sort of behavior goes against their reseller

RE: [sniffer] Last chance to renew at the old price!

Ah-ha! I think I see now. They need the money to buy new calculators for their staff! (see below). That said, even if they are right and it's a 34% price increase, it is still unheard of from any company I've ever dealt with. Michael Murdoch's Calculator: $325 x 1.34 (34% increase) = $435 My

RE: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

Same exact IP here! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick HayerSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 5:42 PMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: Re: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus? Was this the ip? 209.67.220.164 This is the only address I have seen - -Nick Scott Fisher

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Message Sniffer Plugin for MDaemon Wide Beta Promo

Pete, I've been using this plugin for the last couple of months and can say it's been rock solid. Nice work! One little feature request though would be to add an option to auto prune the sniffer log file to so many days, or X killobytes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Seperate Lists?

Thanks Matt for clarifying my point, and Pete for considering this. Oddly enough, I would likely subscribe to BOTH lists, but the seperation would allow me to filter, target and respond to more 'important' emails notices, and review discussions *IF* and/or when I have time. As an Email/Network