Re[4]: [sniffer] POP Approach

On Friday, October 14, 2005, 9:39:33 AM, Rick wrote: RH What is going on with the sniffer not catching any of the spam that is now RH coming through? We are getting slammed with medication, mortgage and other RH junk email? Your license has expired. Please send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] POP Approach

Hello Pete, Are you going to implement something similar for false positives? Thanks, Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:32 AM To: William Van Hefner Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] POP

Re[4]: [sniffer] POP Approach

On Friday, October 14, 2005, 11:18:18 AM, Daniel wrote: DB Hello Pete, DB Are you going to implement something similar for false positives? No. The false positive process is very interactive, so each case is handled individually until it is resolved. This works best as it is currently

Re: Re[4]: [sniffer] POP Approach

PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:03 AM Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] POP Approach On Friday, October 14, 2005, 9:39:33 AM, Rick wrote: RH What is going on with the sniffer not catching any of the spam that is now RH coming through? We are getting slammed with medication, mortgage and other RH

Re: [sniffer] POP

Hi Pete, I don't believe that I received an answer to my question (below) Thank you. Dear Pete, Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you? Mike Stein Computer House www.computerhouse.com This

Re: [sniffer] POP Approach

On Wednesday, October 12, 2005, 5:03:44 PM, support wrote: s Dear Pete, s Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we s waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you? Anyone can switch to this method at any time. Our current policy is to ask anyone who

Re[2]: [sniffer] POP Approach

Yes, this is correct. Most of the time the login is the same as the email address and this helps us easily recognize sources. We simply need to know the login information and how the messages will arrive at the address so that we can properly classify the messages we pull from there. _M On

Re[2]: [sniffer] POP Approach

On Wednesday, October 12, 2005, 6:30:45 PM, William wrote: WVH Pete, WVH Was just wondering, I have all of my e-mail pass through an IMGate/Postfix WVH machine prior to hitting my main mail server. Sometimes, e-mail (especially WVH spam) gets forwarded from the secondary MX as well. If we use

[sniffer] POP Approach

Dear Pete, Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you? Mike Stein Computer House - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [sniffer] POP Approach

And do we just tell you what email address we're using and give you account login and password? Thanks for you help Kevin Rogers support wrote: Dear Pete, Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you?

RE: [sniffer] POP Approach

Pete, Was just wondering, I have all of my e-mail pass through an IMGate/Postfix machine prior to hitting my main mail server. Sometimes, e-mail (especially spam) gets forwarded from the secondary MX as well. If we use the POP method of redirecting spam to an appropriate mailbox are you just