On 4/6/2010 2:33 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Pete,
Thanks.
Yes, we did submit a report, but it appears the rule used the wrong set of
message headers and filtered our customer instead of the spam they were
reporting.
The rule was coded for content at the end of the message -- not for any
con
t: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 1:25 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 3059196
On 4/6/2010 12:48 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> We've put a RulePanic in for 3059196, as we're getting a lot of FPs on it.
>
> Can you look at this rule, and/or let me know what it is?
&g
On 4/6/2010 12:48 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Pete,
We've put a RulePanic in for 3059196, as we're getting a lot of FPs on it.
Can you look at this rule, and/or let me know what it is?
The rule is a bit.ly link found in spamtraps.
The link leads to a specific constant-contact list sign-up pag
Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 3059196
Hi Pete,
We've put a RulePanic in for 3059196, as we're getting a lot of FPs on
it.
Can you look at this rule, and/or let me know what it is?
Thanks,
Darin.
#
This
Hi Pete,
We've put a RulePanic in for 3059196, as we're getting a lot of FPs on it.
Can you look at this rule, and/or let me know what it is?
Thanks,
Darin.
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing lis
