RE: [sniffer] Test

2006-05-16 Thread John T (Lists)
Pong John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: sniffer@sortmonster.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:12 PM To: sniffer@sortmonster.com Subject: Test Hello sniffer, Just testing. --

Re: [sniffer] Test

2006-05-16 Thread Nick Hayer
pong... Pete McNeil wrote: Hello sniffer, Just testing. This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Re: [sniffer] Test

2006-05-16 Thread Sharon . Daniels
Message received... Sharon Portage College |-+-- | | Pete McNeil| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | search.com| | | Sent by: | | | [EMAIL

RE: [sniffer] Test

2005-08-04 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Ping? Pong. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert MathiasSent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:59 PMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: [sniffer] Test Apologies, but need to test. Robert

RE: [sniffer] test sender

2004-12-10 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message Well, an indirect way to do this is to use the (undocumented?) Declude directive: rsp set off TESTNAME as the first bit of text in your test message. That won't actually trigger sniffer, but it will for the purpose of making your JunkMail think that the test has been

Re:[sniffer] Test ordering/precedence

2004-12-02 Thread Serge
Where can i find examples of using exit codes to assign different weights depending on groupes, when using sniffer with declude/imail ? TIA - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jim Matuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:59 PM Subject:

RE: [sniffer] Test ordering/precedence

2004-09-18 Thread John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Matt Matt Matt. Then everyone would have to make sure they made the relevant changes on their systems. As we have seen on the Declude Junkmail list, there will always be those who set up their systems and then forget about them. Making a change like that would cause problems.

Re: [sniffer] Test ordering/precedence

2004-09-18 Thread Matt
John, If you read this more carefully, I was not suggesting that action be taken that would affect everyone's system in such a way that it would require modifications. The 60 result code was recently changed from Gray rules to IP rules, and that change may or may not suggest a modification to

Re: [sniffer] Test ordering/precedence

2004-09-18 Thread Matt
Thanks Pete, but let me just stress the largest issue that I see and I think you already are aware of it. The new IP classification is the most likely to produce false positives and it's result code of 60 places precedence of that over General, Experimental and Obfuscation hits. There is a

RE: [sniffer] test

2004-05-04 Thread Pete McNeil
to 1: 12:24:17 (78.89 KB/s) - `sniffer2.new.gz' saved [1983539/1983539] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sniffer] test mod_gzip is now configured on our web

Re: [sniffer] test

2004-05-04 Thread Russ Uhte (Lists)
At 02:49 PM 5/4/2004, Vivek Khera wrote: On May 4, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Pete McNeil wrote: Every rulebase is potentially a different size composition, plus sizes typically change with each update. I'm glad to hear all the positive reports on this. :-) Forgive me... What is the URL for the zipped

Re: [sniffer] test

2004-05-04 Thread Pete McNeil
At 04:17 PM 5/4/2004, you wrote: At 02:49 PM 5/4/2004, Vivek Khera wrote: On May 4, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Pete McNeil wrote: Every rulebase is potentially a different size composition, plus sizes typically change with each update. I'm glad to hear all the positive reports on this. :-) Forgive me...

Re: [sniffer] test

2004-05-04 Thread Richard Farris
Tech Support - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 3:49 PM Subject: Re: [sniffer] test At 04:17 PM 5/4/2004, you wrote: At 02:49 PM 5/4/2004, Vivek Khera wrote: On May 4, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Pete McNeil wrote

RE: [sniffer] test

2004-05-04 Thread Eddie Arrants
of this problem? Eddie Arrants Cape Lookout Internet Services -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 8:46 PM To: Richard Farris; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sniffer] test This may have been aswered

Re: [sniffer] test

2004-05-01 Thread Pete McNeil
At 07:13 AM 5/1/2004, you wrote: This can be done with wget, for example, but setting this up appears to be technically complex - so I'm going to leave it at that for now. (Requires the --header switch and piping the output through gzip) It is not so complex: In the wget command change -O

RE: [sniffer] test

2004-05-01 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Appears to work beautifully. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sniffer] test At 07:13 AM 5/1/2004, you wrote: This can be done with wget, for example

Re: [sniffer] Test

2004-03-29 Thread Fred
Didn't happen this time, nevermind! Frederic TaraseviciusInternet Information Services, Inc.http://www.i-is.com/810-794-4400mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Fred To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:42 PM Subject: [sniffer] Test

Re: [sniffer] Test

2004-03-29 Thread Pete McNeil
:-) At 04:31 PM 3/29/2004, you wrote: Didn't happen this time, nevermind! Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. http://www.i-is.com/ 810-794-4400 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Fred To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004