RE: [sniffer] MDLP Tests

2005-04-02 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Jay, here's more web information on the mxrate tests: http://www.mxrate.com/lookup/dns.htm Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 1:43 PM To: Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC Subject: Re: [s

RE: [sniffer] MDLP Tests

2005-04-02 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Ahh, that makes more sense now. "ham" is just what does not pass the "spam" threshold. In this light, if Sniffer is "hyper accurate" and catches more real spam than all others, it will appear "less accurate" overall because of the deficienes in the other tests. For some reason, I was thinking tha

Re: [sniffer] MDLP Tests

2005-04-02 Thread Pete McNeil
On Saturday, April 2, 2005, 4:09:31 PM, Jay wrote: JSHNL> Hello - JSHNL> I am reviewing your MDLP report at JSHNL> http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html, and find some JSHNL> tests that are seemingly quite effective that I'm not familiar with. If JSHNL> anyone has any informai

Re: [sniffer] MDLP Tests

2005-04-02 Thread Darrell (supp...@invariantsystems.com)
>>Also, perhaps I am misunderstanding the data, but SNIFFER has a SQ of >>.802 - isn't that relatively "bad" ? Most people do not have single tests that mark the message as spam. Sniffer has the tendancy to hit on messages where others tests do not. So for example on my system Sniffer may hit an

[sniffer] MDLP Tests

2005-04-02 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Hello - I am reviewing your MDLP report at http://www.sortmonster.com/MDLP/MDLP-Example-Long.html, and find some tests that are seemingly quite effective that I'm not familiar with. If anyone has any informaiton about these tests, please let me know: - FABEL (is this the same as FABELSOURCES a

Re[10]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-02 Thread Pete McNeil
On Saturday, April 2, 2005, 1:07:56 PM, Andrew wrote: CA> Pete, your metaphors are wonderful. :-) CA> If I remember correctly, the "MaxPollTime" was originally much lower. I CA> now use the full 4 seconds, but I don't know how often that's needed. I CA> easily see Declude processes taking lo

RE: Re[8]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer

2005-04-02 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Pete, your metaphors are wonderful. ... I don't know why Declude boots its priority, but in the log file at DEBUG level, there are definitely lines that indicate that it has boosted its own CPU priority at the beginning, and lowering at the end. I wasn't too worried about raising the priority of