Re: [sniffer] New RuleBot F002 Online

2006-03-10 Thread Darin Cox
Totally agree.  I'd like to see some separation between rules created by
newer rulebots and preexisting rules.  That way if there becomes an issue
with a bot, we can turn off one group quickly and easily.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] New RuleBot F002 Online


Pete,

In light of current and prolonged issues, this seems like a good and
safe tactic.  I would appreciate it however if maybe you could place the
rules in another result code since this result code is not as accurate
as some others are and some of us weight it lower than others.

Thanks,

Matt



Pete McNeil wrote:

>Hello Sniffer Folks,
>
>  Rulebot F002 has been placed online.
>
>  This rulebot captures and creates geocities web links from the
>  "chatty" campaigns. This is largely a time saver for us humans... we
>  will focus our attention more on abstracts for these campaigns now
>  that F002 will be capturing the raw links.
>
>  Rules from F002 will produce a 60 result code (Ungrouped).
>
>  The engine is following a standard protocol that we have used for
>  months. I expect no false positives from this one.
>
>Thanks,
>_M
>
>Pete McNeil (Madscientist)
>President, MicroNeil Research Corporation
>Chief SortMonster (www.sortmonster.com)
>Chief Scientist (www.armresearch.com)
>
>
>This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
>
>
>
>


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


Re: [sniffer] New RuleBot F002 Online

2006-03-10 Thread Matt

Pete,

In light of current and prolonged issues, this seems like a good and 
safe tactic.  I would appreciate it however if maybe you could place the 
rules in another result code since this result code is not as accurate 
as some others are and some of us weight it lower than others.


Thanks,

Matt



Pete McNeil wrote:


Hello Sniffer Folks,

 Rulebot F002 has been placed online.

 This rulebot captures and creates geocities web links from the
 "chatty" campaigns. This is largely a time saver for us humans... we
 will focus our attention more on abstracts for these campaigns now
 that F002 will be capturing the raw links.

 Rules from F002 will produce a 60 result code (Ungrouped).

 The engine is following a standard protocol that we have used for
 months. I expect no false positives from this one.

Thanks,
_M

Pete McNeil (Madscientist)
President, MicroNeil Research Corporation
Chief SortMonster (www.sortmonster.com)
Chief Scientist (www.armresearch.com)


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


 




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


Re: [sniffer] New add compain

2006-03-10 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, March 10, 2006, 2:00:42 PM, John wrote:

JTL> I am seeing a log of spam with a subject line of with fw: or re: followed 
by
JTL> the username portion of the reciepient. Any way to create a rule for this?

There's nothing simple we can do for this one based on that alone - at
least not without risking a lot of false positives. We are looking at
structural abstracts wherever there is content. Many that we see are
empty.

SNF is not yet good at seeing what is NOT there.

_M



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


[sniffer] New add compain

2006-03-10 Thread John T (Lists)
I am seeing a log of spam with a subject line of with fw: or re: followed by
the username portion of the reciepient. Any way to create a rule for this?

John T
eServices For You

"Seek, and ye shall find!"





This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


[sniffer] New RuleBot F002 Online

2006-03-10 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Sniffer Folks,

  Rulebot F002 has been placed online.

  This rulebot captures and creates geocities web links from the
  "chatty" campaigns. This is largely a time saver for us humans... we
  will focus our attention more on abstracts for these campaigns now
  that F002 will be capturing the raw links.

  Rules from F002 will produce a 60 result code (Ungrouped).

  The engine is following a standard protocol that we have used for
  months. I expect no false positives from this one.

Thanks,
_M

Pete McNeil (Madscientist)
President, MicroNeil Research Corporation
Chief SortMonster (www.sortmonster.com)
Chief Scientist (www.armresearch.com)


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html