Hello Sniffer Folks,
This is an alert about a potentially bad rule 1604021.
The rule was an abstract pattern for some of today's image spam.
Indications are that the final coding was too broad. The rule was in
place for approximately 5 hours ending about 30 minutes ago. Some
differences in
Hi Pete,
We have fileret out 169 mails based on this rule.
Most are spam.
I have just collected the latest rulebase - it is from 20.00,
The false positive are still taken as spam.
If you want the 169 please let me know.
--22:37:49-- http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/xx.snf
Hi Pete,
Checked all manuelly, 7 of 155 was good.
The new rule database don't match on any of the 7.
All 155 is matched as spam.
Monday, October 15, 2007, 4:43:03 PM, you wrote:
Hi Pete,
We have fileret out 169 mails based on this rule.
Most are spam.
That's good to hear.
Thanks!
_M
I just tried installing the beta and it appeared to work too well as
it was sending all the mail to the spam box. I am not sure if this
was due to the bad rule that was just replaced or something I was doing wrong.
I am currently running in the persistent mode. I set the xml file to
point to
Hello Phillip,
Monday, October 15, 2007, 6:39:22 PM, you wrote:
I just tried installing the beta and it appeared to work too well as
it was sending all the mail to the spam box. I am not sure if this
was due to the bad rule that was just replaced or something I was doing wrong.
The bad
