.new.gz' saved [2646653]
JC> -----Original Message-
JC> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JC> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JC> On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
JC> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:46 PM
JC> To: Chuck Schick
JC> Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow.
JC> I&#
Somebody please tell me I'm doing something wrong here. I use this
expression in Baregrep "Final\t828931" and it yields 22,055 matching
lines across 3 of my 4 license's log files.
Since this is set to my hold weight, I'm assuming that means I've had
22,055 holds on this rule?
--
Best regards,
D
EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:46 PM
To: Chuck Schick
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow.
I'm not showing this from my location and the server looks ok.
I just downloaded a few rulebases, each in under 3 seconds.
Please provide a tracerou
I'm not showing this from my location and the server looks ok.
I just downloaded a few rulebases, each in under 3 seconds.
Please provide a traceroute -- that should show us where the issue is
(if it is still there).
Thanks,
_M
On Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 4:39:35 PM, Chuck wrote:
CS> Downlo
Download speeds from your server are running 17 kbps at my location.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Matuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
So far it seems to be working, at least it doesn't seem to be downloading
the rulebase yet, I'll have to see i
AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
Quick question if when you have a sucessful download if abcdef.new is
renamed than what is wget comparing on the next run of the script?
Darrell
Jim Matuska writes:
> So far it seems to be working, at least it
al Message-From: Matt
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:45
AMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: Re: [sniffer]
Downloads are slow...Yep. Despite the fact that one
could design a process to work properly with the -N option (also leaving the
old file for
ECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
Quick question if when you have a sucessful download if abcdef.new is
renamed than what is wget
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 2:26:08 PM, Jim wrote:
JM> So far it seems to be working, at least it doesn't seem to be downloading
JM> the rulebase yet, I'll have to see if it does later when there is an updated
JM> rulebase. My script uses a copy at the end rather than a move. It's listed
JM>
4-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 02:39 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
Quick question if whe
bur Smith Associates
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Jim Matuska
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:49 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
I agree that something needs to be done about the upd
:Done
if exist abcdefg.tst del abcdefg.tst
Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech2, CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Pete McNeil"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Matuska"
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 A
ED]>
To: "Jim Matuska"
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM> I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that
are
JM> inadvertently downloading th
m: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Matuska"
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM> I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM> I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that are
JM> inadvertently downloading the full rulebase all the time. I didn't even
JM> know it but we were doing this until I went through our update script again
JM> this
Brian Gregory wrote:
Does anyone have some simple instructions on how to setup to use a program
alias?
I'm using Bill Landry's script, have not had the time to look in to using a
program alias to download upon receipt of notifications.
I just setup a program alias about 2 weeks ago using this as t
-0494 x104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Woody G Fussell
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:25 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
Why do you not use a "program alias" an
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jim Matuska
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:49 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that are
ina
erce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
I agree entirely. If bandwidth has become an issue, it would be resolved
with a foc
6
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 08:10 AM
To: Chuck Schick
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow
tware.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 08:10 AM
To: Chuck Schick
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 1:17:21 AM, Chuck wrote:
CS> Pete:
CS> It appea
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 1:17:21 AM, Chuck wrote:
CS> Pete:
CS> It appears on weekends the sniffer downloads are really slow. I am
CS> downloading at 14 minutes past the hour and I am about 1/20 th of the normal
CS> speed.
That is an unusual observation - I don't think weekends have anyth
Pete:
It appears on weekends the sniffer downloads are really slow. I am
downloading at 14 minutes past the hour and I am about 1/20 th of the normal
speed.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un
24 matches
Mail list logo
