Re: [sniffer]SPF

2006-06-07 Thread Darin Cox
Huh?  No, not at all.  Check it again.  It will work as specified. Darin.     - Original Message - From: Computer House Support To: Message Sniffer Community Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: Re: [sniffer]SPF Hi Darin,   FYI, I tried putting in v=spf1 mx -all as

Re: [sniffer]SPF

2006-06-07 Thread Computer House Support
f1 a -all" Does this sound right to you?     Mike Stein   - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: Message Sniffer Community Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:54 PM Subject: Re: [sniffer]SPF What's your hold weight?  If spam is only failing SPF and nothing else,

Re: [sniffer]SPF

2006-06-06 Thread Darin Cox
What's your hold weight?  If spam is only failing SPF and nothing else, then the message doesn't get held, so you don't see it.   Also, I do not recommend negative weighting SPFPASS.  Spammers have SPF records, too, so you're giving them an opportunity to exploit it.   Lastly, I think you ma