Hi,
Another topic on stock spam? Lots of them are coming through. What do you
guys do to limit the number of false negatives?
Michiel
We've been getting a horrendous amount of
complaints as well the past few weeks. I keep
hoping the sniffer folks will pull through sooner than later.
Jonathan
At 09:57 AM 12/12/2006, you wrote:
Hi,
Another topic on stock spam? Lots of them are
coming throughÂ… What do you guys do to limit
Hello Herb,
Tuesday, December 12, 2006, 12:32:09 PM, you wrote:
We were seeing lots of unmarked pump and dump stock spam a week or so
ago but now almost non is getting thru. Sniffer is catching most of it
and some other declude and rbl tests are as well.
It's interesting to see such mixed
On the sub topic of increased spam rates we're seen a 10x increase from
30-40k per day to 250-450k per day in over the last 3 months, none of this
due to increased customer count :(
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent:
We went from about 40K total messages a day on about 10K good at the
beginning of the year, to 60K over summer, 90K in Sept, and about 180K
now with about 13K good, w about a 20% increase in mailboxes. Had to
upgrade our server a few weeks ago.
We also for the first time went to deleting
It's interesting to see such mixed results posted. It makes me wonder
what the differences are between the systems reporting high catch
rates (which we also see, once a campaign has been analyzed) and low
catch rates.
I personally found the importance of triggered updates. I was receiving lots
We started using tests for the different sniffer categories recently and are
finding that snifferwhitelist is very innacurate
ot is substracting wheight from more real spam than it does of non-spam
messages
should we just drop it ? what are you guys doing about this ?
TIA
Serge, what return value are you using for this snifferwhitelist?
The official and current list of return codes is here:
http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer.TechnicalDetai
ls.ResultCodes
If you're using 0, then don't do that, because zero is also used for
no result.
I'm using 000, isnt that right ?
not sure how we can check logs when we call sniffer from declude
Pete, why keep the confusion ? why not have a different code than 0 or 000 ?
something like -1, or 100
- Original Message -
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer
posted this before getting pete's post
please disregard
- Original Message -
From: Serge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:11 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer White List
I'm using 000, isnt that right ?
not
Pete,
Is it ok to submit spam where the header and subjet were modified by declude
?
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Serge,
Yes.
Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 12:44:13 AM, you wrote:
Pete,
Is it ok to submit spam where the header and subjet were modified by declude
?
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the
12 matches
Mail list logo
