Hi,
This morning I had to file to false positive reports because emails from
Wanadoo.FR and UOL.COM.BR were triggering SNIFFER-IP.
I don't know if this is a coincidence or if this is a worrisome new trend
caused by someone new in this field how is now coding Sniffer rules
without even a basic
Hello Andy,
Thursday, December 28, 2006, 10:34:15 AM, you wrote:
Hi,
This morning I had to file to false positive reports because emails from
Wanadoo.FR and UOL.COM.BR were triggering SNIFFER-IP.
I don't know if this is a coincidence or if this is a worrisome new trend
snip/
Our IP rule
Hi Pete,
Thanks.
Let me apologize for the accusatory tone of my message. Someone pointed out
to me that my annoyance made me cross the line of being offensive.
I would suggest to add some intelligence to the bot F001, where it compares
implicated address ranges against a table of excepted IPs,
Well, I guess I will ruffle someones feathers again with my response here,
but like your oringial message, I think we need to be honest here. This is
not a message sniffer 'popularity' contest after all, we are paying
customers and need to ensure SNF causes no False Postives.
Over the last few
Hello Andy,
Thursday, December 28, 2006, 3:16:57 PM, you wrote:
snip/
need to ensure SNF causes no False Positives
I agree here. While I can excuse the occasional accidental FP - there
should NOT be the mindset that customers just have to live with the fact
that the IP rules WILL always
