I will be out of town for a few days. I will be checking emails frequently
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Where can I find a list of the latest result codes.
- Original Message -
From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Message Sniffer Community"
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 7:56 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Experimental Abstract
I concur Pete in that I have been thinking about uppi
Fred
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list .
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EM
Do we just replace our current file with this one.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Call for beta testers... snfrv2r3b1
> Hello folks,
>
> I know folks are anxious to get thei
What is the number after Polled waited:
I also noticed that when many emails are coming in I still see multiple
Sniffer.exe programs running.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Madscientist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [s
When I installed it in a persistence mode I notice very little improvement.
When my server is busy it can load 30 or more instances of the program.
Is it loading from the drive or is it taking off the persistence one.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Yes it should be running I see the window with the Polled waited:
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] RunExeSvc for Persistent sniffer.
> That is unusual. You should see a marked
Looks like it is working as indicated below.
I think it is fine.
The server is just busy these days.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] RunExeSvc for Persistent sniffer.
> A
Same with me.
- Original Message -
From: "Sheldon Koehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Possible Bad Rule?
> I am getting a lot of complaints today from Yahoo users...
>
> Sheldon
>
>
> - Original Message -
Your 8:20 PM update notice Failed Sniffer
What is going on.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XXX.snf Update 20040325.0125
X-RBL-Warning: NOLEGITCONTENT: No content unique to legitimate E-mail
detected. [2-3-1800]
X-RBL-Warning: SNIFFER: Message failed SNIFFER: 63. [2-4-2000]
This E-Mail
Maybe it is time to look at a new snf2check.exe.
One that has some checksum ability.
Say you download two files not one.
One with the rules and the other a checksum file.
Just a thought on how to keep corrupt rules from being put into production.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Pete
What do the number after the Final/Clean
indicate.
- Original Message -
From:
Pete McNeil
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:38
AM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2)
for snfrv2r3
Extraordinary...Compare with a snippet from our IMail/NT4
What is the best and proper way to setup Persistent mode on a windows 2000
computer and run as a service.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:30 PM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
This worked great.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
> At 08:36 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
> >What is the best and proper way to setup Pers
Pete.
I am seeing major download problems of the SNF file tonight.
Any problems with others.
Fred
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Pete.
Should we be able to just replace our .exe file with this one
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 6:59 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Message Sniffer Version 2-3 Official Release!
> 2004-05-08 - Message S
The persistent mode stopped working after installing new program.
Revert back to old one and it works???
Start xx.exe x persistent
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] M
!
>
> It seems to be working fine for me. I have it running as a service, per
> Matt's instructions using the W2K resource kit files, and it has been
> running fine all day.
>
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Frederick Samarelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
1103116862
> LicenseID 20040510025523 Def05007d04c02029.SMD 10 30
> Final 54070 52 0 274862
> LicenseID 20040510025639 Def62008204c0202c.SMD 10 60
> Match 40539 62 5135517867
> LicenseID 20040510025639 Def62
think you will find that it is
> working.
>
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Frederick Samarelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 8:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [sniffer] Message Sniffer Version 2-3 Official
I have seen this and been sending them on the Spam@
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: [sniffer] spam leakage up
> In the last couple days we are seeing quite an increase in the amount o
Link not working
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:55 AM
Subject: [sniffer] New beta v2-3.0i4
Hello Sniffer Folks,
I have a new version of Message Sniffer ready for wide beta testing.
* This version h
Running without issue.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?
Hello Sniffer Folks,
I'd like to get an idea how many have tried the Release C
I am seeing a high rate of junk slipping past Sniffer over the past week.
Has anything changed.
Fred
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
I am seeing a large amount of SPAM Pass Sniffer today.
Am I alone.
Fred
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
No errors. Just SPAM showing as clean.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Frederick Samarelli"
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] SPAM
On Monday, March 7, 2005, 6:40:52 PM, Frederick wrote:
FS> I am
1 Insufficient System Storage.(IMail 6.05)
Original message follows.
Received: from Freds [64.124.117.139] by bks.tcbinc.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id AA105E90218; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:52:32 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Frederick Samarelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
I am finding that most if not all email from Comcast senders are failing
Sniffer.
Fred
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Can you send the update or I will have to disable
Sniffer.
It is catching almost all our emails.
Same with me. Last night there was a rules update and it fixed the problem.
Check the date of your rules update.
- Original Message -
From: "Ali Resting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:57 AM
Subject: [sniffer] False Positives
Hi
30 matches
Mail list logo
