[sniffer] Re: Stock spam

2006-12-12 Thread Jonathan
We've been getting a horrendous amount of complaints as well the past few weeks. I keep hoping the sniffer folks will pull through sooner than later. Jonathan At 09:57 AM 12/12/2006, you wrote: Hi, Another topic on stock spam? Lots of them are coming throughÂ… What do you guys do to limit

[sniffer] Re: Stock spam

2006-12-12 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Herb, Tuesday, December 12, 2006, 12:32:09 PM, you wrote: We were seeing lots of unmarked pump and dump stock spam a week or so ago but now almost non is getting thru. Sniffer is catching most of it and some other declude and rbl tests are as well. It's interesting to see such mixed

[sniffer] Re: Stock spam

2006-12-12 Thread David Waller
: 12 December 2006 17:43 To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: Stock spam # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[sniffer] Re: Stock spam

2006-12-12 Thread Herb Guenther
Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: 12 December 2006 17:43 To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: Stock spam # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing

[sniffer] Re: Stock spam

2006-12-12 Thread Bill Green dfn Systems
It's interesting to see such mixed results posted. It makes me wonder what the differences are between the systems reporting high catch rates (which we also see, once a campaign has been analyzed) and low catch rates. I personally found the importance of triggered updates. I was receiving lots