Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM

2000-07-21 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen
, > > Joel > > > -Original Message- > > From: YK Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 3:17 AM > > To: Karlton Spindle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM > > > >

Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM, IPD, PPM, IOU, CIA, ETC.

2000-07-21 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen
If this is not about our hobby/sport, what do you propose we talk about? "d. o. darnell" wrote: > ...Loud, irritating and never ending. Like > some of the more commercially oriented members...I hope that all involved parties >will now zip up their pants and let's get back to talking about soa

Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM

2000-07-21 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen
What you are refering to is an internal function of specific RX's that when sensing a voltage level that is near the operating threshold, will move the channel normally associated with flaps (or throttle) to it's opposite position (deployed, or idle). This function is separate from the other fails

Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM, IPD, PPM, IOU, CIA, ETC.

2000-07-20 Thread Ben Diss
Mike, Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. Let me just point out a couple of things. First, I'm not completely unintelligent. I am capable of separating the wheat from the chaff. I know BS when I see it. I know science when I see it. I think most of the people who subscribe to this l

Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM

2000-07-20 Thread Karlton Spindle
gt; To: Karlton Spindle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM > At 09:30 AM 7/20/00 -0700, you wrote: > > >The 7ch IPD out now is single conversion when tested with other single > >conversion receivers it wins

Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM

2000-07-20 Thread Mike Stump
At 09:30 AM 7/20/00 -0700, Karlton wrote: >The 7ch IPD out now is single conversion when tested with other single >conversion receivers it wins HANDS down. << vs JR ABC&W receivers... (549, 636, 649, among others) I'd really love to see that data... > BUT put a duel conversion PCM and >do the

Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM

2000-07-20 Thread Bbary
An important feature is being overlooked in these tests and the debate. PCM (and I think IPD) are programmed to go into fail safe when the voltage level drops below 4.8 or 4.7 volts. PCM rx's emit a low battery warning which if ignored, will deploy the fail safe mode. For those of u using 5

Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM

2000-07-20 Thread YK Chan
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 9:20 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM > Don't take my word take my test! We were over 50 feet and still receiving no > glitch this morning with collapsed antennas. >

[RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM

2000-07-19 Thread VDeller
OK- so lets have the hard numbers-Was it a 10 foot difference, or 100 feet , or a 1/4 mile difference. You certainly don't expect us to take your word for it do you? ;-) Vince D In a message dated 00-07-19 10:16:43 EDT, you write: > Date: 00-07-19 10:16:43 EDT > From:[EMAIL PROTECTED