On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:50 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> On Thu,
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> >> > On
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> On Tue,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-)
>
> Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said
> viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing.
>
> viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm
>
>
Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-)
Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said
viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing.
viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm
viewhelp_webkit2.py was added by sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.src.rpm
sugar-dropWebKitGtk3.patch
On 10/26/2017 01:29 PM, James Cameron wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> >> > On
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James Cameron wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:15:16PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
>> >> On
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:15:16PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:39 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >>
>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:15:16PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:39 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 06:13:51PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
>>
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:15:16PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:39 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 06:13:51PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:03 PM, James Cameron <[1][2]qu...@laptop.org>
>
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:39 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 06:13:51PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:03 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org>
> wrote:
> > Familiar. Looks like RHBZ #1490668.
> >
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 06:13:51PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:03 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> Familiar. Looks like RHBZ #1490668.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490668
>
> Sugar doesn't log to systemd journal, so best
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:03 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Familiar. Looks like RHBZ #1490668.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490668
>
> Sugar doesn't log to systemd journal, so best log file is still
> ~/.sugar/default/logs/shell.log ... is that file present?
>
>
Familiar. Looks like RHBZ #1490668.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490668
Sugar doesn't log to systemd journal, so best log file is still
~/.sugar/default/logs/shell.log ... is that file present?
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:38:21PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
> Tested with
15 matches
Mail list logo