Re: [SoaS] Fix Startup issue with F35 SOAS

On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:40 AM Alex Perez wrote: > > There's a fixed Fedora 35 SoaS ISO at > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-F35-20220211.iso > which I have confirmed is working as expected. > > The above ISO is 1.2 gigabytes in size. Great, do we know why/how this

Re: [SoaS] Announcement: Sugar on a Stick (SoaS) 34 released today

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:42 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > Folks, > > Fedora 34 was released today, which means that we've got a new release > of Sugar on a Stick 34, which includes Sugar 0.118, and can be > downloaded from: > >

Re: [SoaS] Call for testing of Fedora 34 beta Sugar On A Stick

> This is a call for testing of the upcoming Fedora 34 based Sugar on a Stick, > which is now ready for testing on the following platforms: > > For 64-bit PCs, the ISO can be downloaded from: > >

Re: [SoaS] Fast-tracking fix for language control panel in F34 branch

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 9:12 PM Martin Guy wrote: > > On 13/02/2021, Alex Perez wrote: > > keep testing the compose. It is at this stage of the game in previous > > iterations that we've seen some > > significant regressions. > > > > I suggest going against Sugar Labs convention and report

Re: [SoaS] Fast-tracking fix for language control panel in F34 branch

> Peter, > > What needs to be done to fast-track this fix in the F34 branch? > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7e62d9763d As per the F-34 schedule [1] nothing is required ATM, it will go through the CI process and land into stable and will be included in the next successful

[SoaS] Fwd: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

If people want these sugar packages saved someone will need to follow the policy to get them assigned and update bugs to confirm intentions else they will be garbage collected RSN. Peter Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ Note that

Re: [SoaS] Sugar-starchart, flipsticks, labyrinth in Fedora Rawhide fails to install due to no python3 activity port

On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 8:52 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > Ibiam, > > As of tonight's latest nightly build, sugar-starchart will not install, > due to the missing python2 toolkit dependency. Are you planning on > fixing this prior to the release of Fedora 34, which would need to be in > the next week

Re: [SoaS] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:56 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > SOAS was failing to build in F34 due to telepathy-salut being deprecated and > needed as a dependency in sugar, F33 beta had an issue where startup goes > straight to login. > > Both have been fixed after today's

Re: [SoaS] Building the SoaS spin from source

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:50 AM James Cameron wrote: > > Journal over Home View is a bug in Metacity. Upgrade to 3.34 or > later. Or use F3 key as a workaround. > > I don't know of any Fedora SoaS build-from-source instructions. The livemedia-creator (in the lorax package) is used, it's in the

Re: [SoaS] Fwd: Fedora 33 Beta is GO

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 6:23 PM Alex Perez wrote: > Peter, > > Peter Robinson wrote on 9/25/20 12:27 AM: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 7:51 PM Alex Perez wrote: > >> FYI. Fedora 33 Beta is GO. The Final Freeze begins on 6 October, ~11 days >> from today. >>

Re: [SoaS] Fwd: Fedora 33 Beta is GO

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 7:51 PM Alex Perez wrote: > FYI. Fedora 33 Beta is GO. The Final Freeze begins on 6 October, ~11 days > from today. > > Latest F33 SoaS beta at > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/33_Beta-1.3/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-33_Beta-1.3.iso > Arm:

[SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] RIP: Thomas Gilliard (satellit)

FYI for those that may have known and worked with Thomas. -- Forwarded message - From: Adam Williamson Date: Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:49 AM Subject: [Test-Announce] RIP: Thomas Gilliard (satellit) To: Hi, folks. I'm sad to report that Thomas Gilliard (satellit), who was a valued

Re: [SoaS] Help!

On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:54 PM Adam Payton wrote: > > > Hi, > > I just fully installed Soas only a very old laptop. I was able to run it > fine from the USB. I fully installed it from the USB with anaconda and now > when I go to first boot it up it's showing the below screenshot and won't let

Re: [SoaS] Fwd: Retired Fedora packages with maintainers

Fedora. Peter > Peter Robinson May 12, 2020 at 2:27 PM > > Here's a curated list of packages that are/may be relevant to us/SoaS: > > rpms/sugar-analyze is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/sugar-analyze is retired and has the following: 'maintainers':

Re: [SoaS] Fwd: Retired Fedora packages with maintainers

> Here's a curated list of packages that are/may be relevant to us/SoaS: > > rpms/sugar-analyze is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/sugar-analyze is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': > pbrobinson, tuxbrewr, callkalpa This was retired in f-29, I don't remember

Re: [SoaS] Urgent need to incorporate patch into sugar-toolkit-gtk3 for F32 SoaS, then request re-spin

Alex, > What is the process for requesting a re-spin of F32 SoaS? I've > discovered an unfortunate bug in the release F32 SoaS > sugar-toolkit-gtk3, and the necessary patch is here: The process is one of two methods 1) get in a time machine and go back to a time prior to release 2) we fix it for

Re: [SoaS] Fwd: Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick is available now!

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:11 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > > Fedora 32 has been released, and the Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick spin is > available for download from https://bit.ly/F32-SoAS-x86_64-ISO. It is 950 > megabytes in size. > > The 32-bit Fedora SoaS ARM image, suitable for use on Raspberry Pi

Re: [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

> With Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso I'm hearing no sound. > And see no log messages. > > Is this a common problem? Ultimately in this cycle in particular an awful lot changed, we moved completely from python2 -> python3 among a lot of other changes. For me the Speak activity works for me

Re: [SoaS] Fedora 32 Final is GO, SoaS Release Candidate ISO available immediately

int the porting and testing of them is complete. > > Special thanks to Peter Robinson and Ibiam Chihurumnaya for making the > Sugar-specific bits of this spin possible. > ___ > SoaS mailing

Re: [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick beta ISO ready for testing

> Fedora 32 has entered beta state, and the Sugar on a Stick beta ISO (size is > 1 gigabyte) can be downloaded from http://bit.ly/SoaS-F32-Beta-ISO > > One known issue is that the IRC activity fails to start, and can not be used, > as it's not yet been ported to Python 3. There's currently 4

Re: [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

> > > > > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, [...] > > > > Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. [...] > > > > > > As far as I can see all those deps are there. > > > > > > I see the following crash: > > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): [...] > > >

Re: [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

> > > > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, [...] > > > Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. [...] > > > > As far as I can see all those deps are there. > > > > I see the following crash: > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): [...] > > File

Re: [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

> > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, ideally should be > > ported to python 3. > > No, v41 is Python 3 already, and should work. Does work on Ubuntu > 20.04 beta. Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. > > The dependencies are unusual for this activity; check

Re: [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

'd like to know > how applying patches works. Thanks. How do you apply patches without packaging? Please read the Fedora docs on packaging: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> &

Re: [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

hem pre-beta and I've since had radio silence since. This has other implications because I will need assistance in the move to python3 from a packaging PoV as I really don't have the time any more to do this all on my own. Peter > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:10:08AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >

[SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

Hi All, Just a reminder we're in final freeze for Fedora 31, I'm assuming people are testing it. Just a reminder you can get the latest nightly composes here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-31/compose/Spins/x86_64/iso/

Re: [SoaS] The plan moving forward for SoaS with Fedora 31 and Fedora 32

gt; Thanks. Interesting. > > > Forwarded Message > > Subject: Re: Packages in Fedora > >Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:02:59 +0100 > >From: Peter Robinson > > To: Alex Perez > > Hi Alex, > > > > > Thanks for reaching out. I am worki

Re: [SoaS] The plan moving forward for SoaS with Fedora 31 and Fedora 32

> > Forwarding an abridged version of Peter's response to the SoaS ML for > completeness, and so we can continue the conversation there. > > Forwarded Message ---- > Subject: Re: Packages in Fedora > Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:02:59 +0100 > From: Peter Robinson

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] F30 ARM (Raspberry Pi) SoaS not working, but a fix exists..

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:16 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > James Cameron wrote on 5/19/19 3:50 PM: > > That's unfortunate. > Agreed, but it was due to a lack of testing. > > > > Were the Fedora 30 ARM builds being tested before release? > They were, but only in QEMU, it would seem. The temporary

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Fedora 30 SoaS (Sugar on A Stick) final released

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:07 PM Walter Bender wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:58 AM Alex Perez wrote: >> >> The Fedora 30 release was earlier today, and with it comes the Fedora 30 >> Sugar on a Stick environment, which now has functional collaboration, out of >> the box. It includes

Re: [SoaS] Fwd: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Retire Python 2

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:20 PM Walter Bender wrote: > gives us a year.. hopefully we'll make great strides during GSoC 2019 > Except it doesn't really. There are other things that are being actively removed. For example the python2 bindings for xapian, which is used by sugar-datastore, fails

Re: [SoaS] Fedora 30 (Release Candidate 1) SoaS images ready for testing

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:28 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > Folks, > > > Just under the wire, we have managed to get some critical Sugar on a Stick > issues fixed, which are now included in Fedora 30 SoaS images. I would like > to extend a very special thanks to Peter Robins

Re: [SoaS] Collaboration Between Activities Fail

You might want to check the local firewall ports On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:09 PM Samson Goddy wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > We've been working on installing SOAS on some computers in a school and we > were testing collaboration using CAT5 cables connected to a router > and also connected to the two

Re: [SoaS] Errors from Soas 29

Have you applied all the latest updates to Fedora, a number of issues have been fixed with Fedora 29 updates. Peter On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:52 AM Samson Goddy wrote: > Hello, > > Ibiam and I are currently working to install Sugar in the classroom, so we > decided to download Soas 32-bit

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Hey James, Happy New Year! > > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > > > >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. > > > > >> Are there any plans to

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Help soas is not building in fedora30 rawhide

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:41 PM James Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:23:44PM -0500, Frederick Grose wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:03 PM Thomas Gilliard > > wrote: > > > > > > Helpsoas is not building in fedora30 rawhide > > > > The livemedia.log shows this error

Re: [SoaS] Bug: Network control panel fails to open

> > > There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29. > > > https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990 > > > > Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been > > retired and we didn't have an explicitly dependency on it. I'm not > > 100% sure that is the case but we might need to change

Re: [SoaS] Bug: Network control panel fails to open

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:11 PM Frederick Grose wrote: > > There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29. > https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990 Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been retired and we didn't have an explicitly dependency on it. I'm not 100% sure that is the

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to > > > > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than > > > > later. > > > > > > St

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:00:11PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > >> that still depend on it. Clo

Re: [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

>> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. >> Are there any plans to move them to gst1? > > They were moved. Check the release

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:43 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:26:21PM +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: >> Hi all, >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Peter, >> > >> > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 >> > >> > 2) There

[SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Hello All, This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback. I've not really had time to deal with Sugar for some time, but it also doesn't tend to take up a lot of time so it's not been a major problem, we glue it together when it breaks etc. Kalpa has done a good job keeping most of the

Re: [SoaS] Etoys for Sugar on a Stick Fedora release 25

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:08 AM, Raul Benitez wrote: > Hi all! > > I have the following configuration: > > * Sugar on a Stick Fedora release 25 > * Sugar 0.108 > > I tried installing: > > Etoys-113.xo activity and Etoys-116.xo activity > > Both have problems with

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 28 SoaS

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:00 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:31:39PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: >> We're in Beta freeze for Fedora 28. > > Thanks for the update. > > Our How To install Sugar on Fedora is here; > https://g

[SoaS] Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 28 SoaS

Hi All, We're in Beta freeze for Fedora 28. We have Sugar 0.112, there's nightly images for the various architectures at the URLs below. Please test so we don't end up in a situation like last cycle where people were testing at the last moment before release.

Re: [SoaS] Fedora 27 RC-1.2

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Frederick Grose <fgr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So I think this should be fixed, along with some other issues. >> >> Please test: >> >>

Re: [SoaS] Fedora 27 RC-1.2

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Frederick Grose <fgr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Frederick Grose <fgr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>&g

Re: [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:50 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Pete

Re: [SoaS] Browse fails to launch in SoaS Fedora 27 beta

So I think this should be fixed, along with some other issues. Please test: x86 64 bit https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/27_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-27-1.2.iso ARMv7 including the Raspberry Pi 2/3:

Re: [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Pete

Re: [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-) > > Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said > viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing. > > viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm > >

Re: [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:15:16PM -0400, Frede

Re: [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:15:16PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:39 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 06:13:51PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: >>

Re: [SoaS] Technical Release - Sugar 0.110

gt; > >> > PR [2] makes the .desktop file creation configurable via a flag >> > passed >> > to setup.py. If we can get a release out with this fix, I think we >> > can >> > fix the current build failures. The other option is after %install, >> >

Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS frustrations & call for proposals

Can you please trim and summarise. That email was almost impossible to read. > This discussion started with Tony's reference to PIXEL, a live CD of the > Raspberry Pi OS. That led to a reference to Sugar on a Stick and a > discussion of its ease of installation. From there the discussion got

Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS installation frustrations

>> previously standard in Fedora, because installing SoaS with persistent >>> storage is essential for the project goal of having a resumable Sugar >>> environment in your pocket. > > This is something Peter Robinson, our SoaS packager, can accomplish or > advise us on.

Re: [SoaS] Technical Release - Sugar 0.110

Hi Sam, I apologise, I never saw the release announcement for any of the dev releases in this cycle nor the GA announcement. I'm not sure what happened as I thought I was on the sugar-devel list. TBH I have seen so little discussion I thought the cycle had been delayed or something. Is there a

Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

>>> Could someone following that more closely offer any additional details >>> and thoughts on possible paths into a easily accessible .108 release? >> >> I am one of the Fedora release engineers, you could not get any closer >> to the process. I would like to >> >> I'd like to see updated

Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: > I understand that there are currently some concerns about whether SOAS > will come out with Fedora24 due to errors in the build process (sorry, > it is not very clear to me).. It would be a great shame to not make

Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

ain it, I barely have time to do the new releases. > Cheers > > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Fedora 24 >> >> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, T.K. Kang <tsi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> &g

Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

Fedora 24 On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, T.K. Kang <tsi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great. It is sugar .106. Would like to use .108 sugar with better network > connectivity. > Where can we get this build? > > Cheers > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson <

[SoaS] SoaS Review/Article

http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/83446.html ___ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] SOAS

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:46 AM, David Leeming wrote: > Hi, > > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years old but was > a $2000 laptop when new. On this I can't boot and run SOAS. It never > completes booting, you go through the name, colour,

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] SOAS

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:59 AM, James Cameron wrote: > Inline quoted reply. > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:46:37PM +1100, David Leeming wrote: >> Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years >> old but was a $2000 laptop when new. On this I can't boot and

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] SOAS

en it's expected it can be fixed. Peter > Best, > > David Leeming > Solomon Islands > > -Original Message- > From: sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org > [mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 20

[SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Final Release Compose 1 (RC1) Available Now!

Hi All, We're in the last stretch so we're now down to critical fixes. Please test and let me know ASAP. Peter https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_RC1/Images/armhfp/Fedora-SoaS-armhfp-22-1-sda.raw.xz

Re: [SoaS] Sugar on RPi2

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 01:45 +0800, Danishka Navin wrote: Hi there, Does anyone deployed Sugar with either RPi or RPi2? On RPi: Fedora produces a Sugar on a Stick spin with images for a number of ARM

[SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!

Hi All, We're getting to the pointy end of the Fedora 22 release and hence SoaS 22. Below are links to the latest images. Please test. I've seen there's a new Read out (why aren't announcement about new Activites going to list anymore?) but all others should be on latest releases. I look

Re: [SoaS] Speak-49 with Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

. Not sure why numpy is not being found. -walter On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: The error is: import fft_mouth from Numeric import ceil ImportError: No module named

[SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

Hi All, The Fedora 22 Beta RC is out, would be great to get some testing on SoAS/Sugar 0.104 -- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org Date: Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:04 AM Subject: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now! To:

Re: [SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 22 Alpha!

)ModLibre.info][http://ModLibre.info/] === Original message === Le 10/03/2015 19:52, Peter Robinson a écrit : Hi All, Fedora 22 Alpha is out. Please test SoaS v22 :-) There's a few minor known issues: * Obviously 0.104.1 isn't in it just yet [1

Re: [SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 22 Alpha!

://ModLibre.info/] === Original message === Le 10/03/2015 19:52, Peter Robinson a écrit : Hi All, Fedora 22 Alpha is out. Please test SoaS v22 :-) There's a few minor known issues: * Obviously 0.104.1 isn't in it just yet [1] :-) * gabble and salut

[SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 22 Alpha!

Hi All, Fedora 22 Alpha is out. Please test SoaS v22 :-) There's a few minor known issues: * Obviously 0.104.1 isn't in it just yet [1] :-) * gabble and salut are missing, to fix: sudo yum install telepathy-gabble telepathy-salut on the command line. This is already fixed and will be in the

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose (SoaS 22)

I normally get them from the QA announcements https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2015-February/125244.html On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: There are any place to get the last link? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose (SoaS 22)

I believe there's a TC7 now On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Downloading. I think I have a fix for Terminal, will test and release a new version. Gonzalo On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All

[SoaS] Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose (SoaS 22)

Hi All, The first compose towards SoaS 22 is out [2][3][4]. I've done some very basic testing and there's problems even failing to start with the following Activities: * Terminal * Speak * Pippy * Ruler So if someone could look and see why that would be fab! Also there's a plan to move to

Re: [SoaS] [Release] Announcing Sugar 0.104.0 (stable)

I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar (sucrose) 0.104.0. This release includes new features and bug fixes from Google Code-In and Summer of Code students, deployments and community members. See the release notes: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Notes Sources:

[SoaS] Sugar on a Stick going forward for F-22 onwards

Hi All, With Fedora/SoaS 21 out for some time I think we have a good and stable release. Firstly I'd like to thank the awesome test effort to get a large chuck of testing done and fixes in for the deadline. Moving forward I'm happy to coordinate and deal with the release engineering side of

[SoaS] Fwd: Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 5 (RC5) Available Now!

Hi All, SoaS 21 RC5 is out (for about 8 hours) and looks like it might be GA. Please test Peter -- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:33 AM Subject: Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 5 (RC5) Available Now! To:

Re: [SoaS] Pippy-62 with Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21-5

Pippy 62 is in RC5 (which will become GA on Tues). On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: I'll look into the tutorial errors but the physics bug I thought we fixed. Maybe the new version (62) did not make it into the build? -walter On Thu, Dec 4, 2014

[SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

FYI the Fedora 21 RC1 is out. It has all the recent Sugar/SoaS fixes on board so please test :-) I think we're looking pretty good though, thanks for all the recent feedback -- Forwarded message -- From: Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:34

Re: [SoaS] Memorize- with Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21-TC4

I think the remaining error (activity no visible on the circle due to broken translation), is solved in the new sugar-toolkit-gtk3 rpm. May be you can download from here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=595456 and confirm Thank you for this information. I don't know

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously working. The question is what does it do, and

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

to it or performance. Please add it back Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [SoaS] EToys-116 - Tests with Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21-TC3

EToys-116 displays « Cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'initsqueak -m'? » After clicking on this message, the screen is filled by cars and is not usable. That looks weird ... does it work if you run etoys from the Terminal activity? Thank you Bert for your reply, Yes, Etoys

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 11:55 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Hi Iain, Can you copy the attached file to the path where the help activity is installed and confirm if the problem is solved? Yes, Help now starts and displays complete with images. Perfect. I will do a new release. The

[SoaS] SoaS 21 Beta is now available

Hi All, The Sugar on a Stick 21 Beta is now out as part of Fedora 21 Beta https://fedoraproject.org/get-spin-prerelease Details are available here https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-November/003238.html Regards, Peter ___ SoaS

Re: [SoaS] SoaS 10 liveinst OK but two questions

I successfully added GNOME (500 transactions!), however the system is unstable now - neither Sugar nor GNOME can shut down or reboot the system, and the package installer under GNOME fails systematically. I saw on the forums yumex is a possible solution, but wanted your POV first. I've never

Re: [SoaS] SoaS v10 TC5 tests with important activities INCLUDED in the standard distribution

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Fred, Thanks for testing. Peter, Is there any reason we need elements in the build? I don't think it is used by anything but Physics in Sugar and Physics carries its own copy with it. Why do we need to bundle

Re: [SoaS] Jukebox, Read and Write - Re: SoaS v10 TC5 tests with important activities INCLUDED in the standard distribution

/2013 22:44, Peter Robinson a écrit : Hi Jean, JUKEBOX Please strip out the details of the older versions, once a new version comes out the old information only confuses, details will be in the list archives. TC5--- Jukebox.activity

Re: [SoaS] SoaS v10 TC5 tests with important activities INCLUDED in the standard distribution

Hi Jean, JUKEBOX Please strip out the details of the older versions, once a new version comes out the old information only confuses, details will be in the list archives. TC5--- Jukebox.activity appears in /usr/share/sugar/activities

Re: [SoaS] SoaS v10 TC3 tests with usual activities INCLUDED in the standard distribution

Beta-5 TC3 TC5 physics-11 seems to work [ok] Beta-5 TC3 TC5 *but has PROBLEMS with the hand* Beta-5 TC3 TC5 See previous messages Beta-5 TC3 TC5 physics-11.8 seems to work [ok] Beta-5 TC3 TC5 *but has PROBLEMS with the hand* Beta-5 TC3 TC5 See previous messages Beta-5 TC3 TC5 pippy-52

[SoaS] SoaS v10 Test Compose 3

Hi All, For those that are following along and testing the new SoaS release there's a new test compose out. It has a number of fixes in and Write should be back in the build by default. Fedora is now in Freeze locking down for release so we're into bugfix only mode but if we could get a fix soon

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] [Patch] Missing dependencies - sugar

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi All: On SoaS ever wonder why you can't view other SoaSs or XOs

Re: [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing with activities not included in the standard distribution

7 activities cannot be installed. The error message makes reference to [sugar3.bundle.bundle.MalFormedBundleException] What 7? Many activities cannot start. Some start then stop. Again which ones? *Essential activities* (not in SoaS 10) Three of the 4 you mention below are in SoaS 10

Re: [SoaS] No keyboard choice - Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

woops, That should read perhaps sugar-cp-keyboard can replace sugar-cp-powerd Attached proposed change to sugar's spec file and a merge request[1] for the sugar change. Tested on SoaS-F20-5 liveinst in a VM. Jerry 1. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/135 Can we get this in the

Re: [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

Hi, Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily available for the public at large. So during my demonstrations I prefer to present Sugar on a Stick in parallel with the XO :

Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily

  1   2   3   4   >