On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:13:10 -0300 Ricardo Fabiano de Andrade
ricardofabianodeandr...@gmail.com wrote:
RFdA Currently, I'm working with googletest. It's suprisingly simple to
RFdA get used to and extremely produtive.
What are the advantages of Google Test compared to Boost.Test? I know that
Hi
I also don't see much benefits of Google Test vs. Boost.Test. The one
benefit of Google Test is that it's working with Google C++ Mocking
framework. But for Boost.Test there is turtle library with almost same
functionality
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Vadim Zeitlin vz-s...@zeitlins.org
VZ What are the advantages of Google Test compared to Boost.Test? I know
that
you mentioned testing template classes but I've never had any problems with
this when using Boost.Test so I'm not sure what is this about exactly. And
when in doubt, I'd rather choose a Boost library over a Google
On 22 March 2013 14:40, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 22 March 2013 14:26, Vadim Zeitlin vz-s...@zeitlins.org wrote:
I'll try to add the tests too. Just please let me know until when do I have
to do this.
Let's say Sunday midnight :)
I'll have some paperwork to do in CHANGES
