On Friday 29 Aug 2003 11:34 pm, Keith wrote:
It is
interesting as well as surprising to see how narrowly based is the research
on which the conspiracy theories are built--i.e. to Mullins and then to
Quigley, with a bit of Sutton thrown in for flavor.
Enter Anthony C. Sutton in a search engine. Google returns at least as
much as you will probably need. I am not at all sure that Sutton was
anti-Jewish.
Keith
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL
In a message dated 8/30/03 7:39:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enter "Anthony C. Sutton" in a search engine. Google returns at least as
much as you will probably need. I am not at all sure that Sutton was
anti-Jewish.
Keith
I don't think he was. As for how
This was Finlay's take on the matter:
But the nature of this anti-Jewish outlook must be probed, for it is doubtful whether
it can be called anti-Semitism in the normal sense.
--
John L. Finlay, *Social Credit: The English Origins,*
1972, pages 102-105.
(notes omitted)
...What made Douglas
This fits very well with what I learned from Mullins, who picked it up from
Pound.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Anti-Semitism
This was Finlay's take on the matter:
But the
Jessop,
If you go to the site of the Australian League of Rights and look under the
cover of Triumph of the Past you will find a brief essay by Michael Lane
titled Douglas and the Jews. It repeats much of the quotation you have
provided here, plus other confirmation of your supposition.
Keith
