...our democratic political process has not been able
to correct the 3% of GDP shortage of purchasing
power, the 2.3%/year natural rate of inflation, and
the 4% to 10% unemployment rates which the US economy
has suffered for more than a century.
-
These percentages
. Is that what you have in mind?
Keith
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:44 AM
Subject: RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Honest money
My message did not contain those words, the commentary on my message did.
I agree with the many authors who say do social credit, capital homesteading and a higher Earned Income Tax Credit (Basic Income) - although I would make employee-owned firms rather than households eligible to borrow at
This gets to something I tried to propose as a discussion topic, although I think technical difficulties prevented the discussion:
Can change happen without campaign finance reform?
I have some proposals on this topic on my web page at http://www.iowafiscalequity.net/elections.html
Which I
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Honest money. A red herring for Americans?
The message
from Michael Bindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains these words:
Basic Income is not unworkable because it a generalized cash
disbursement but because
for Americans?
Replies inserted [reply] below:
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 07:28:28 -0700
From: Keith Wilde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Honest money. A red
herring for Americans?
Bill, you are confusing me. On several occasions you
have spoken of a ticket, suggesting
