I would certainly concur. One does not wish to load the site with
unnecessary text, but it would be most helpful if conrtibutors and their
messages were clearly connected so that one knows what one is replying
to without having to do a long historical search.
Sincerely
Wally
Victor Bridger
Keith Wilde wrote:
...
The point I wish to make here is that Wells attempted to conform his social
philosophy to a realistic view of human nature, to a perspective of
humankind as a product of biological evolution rather than as a fallen race
of angels. What I am wary of when I hear that
From Keynes' book *The General Theory*:
When employment increases, D1 will increase, but not
by so much as D; since when our income increases our
consumption increases also, but not by so much. The
key to our practical problem is to be found in this
psychological law. For it follows from this
At first glance the categorizations of those who
produce and consume as being the capitalists and
those who only consume being the workers might not
be self-evident.
In the orthodox taxonomy Income = Wages + Profit. It
is said that capitalists produce and consume from
their profit whereas
