Thanks, Victor, this is what I hoped the answer would
be. That is, it is one that I can comprehend. It fits with my
earlier point that individual persons occupy several different roles in a
socioeconomic system, and that it is useful to distinguish among
them.
Keith
- Original
In a message dated 6/10/03 6:06:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael, I think you have gotten it backwards here. The examples cited by Ekky and Curtiss (non-fuel derivatives of coal and petroleum) led to the inference that most of the things we buy are under priced,
Dear Friends,
". . . hardly possible to accurately measure the extent of the imblance between Demand and Price at any time . . . gradual decrease [in national dividend] as production levels start rising to fill the gap as Demand rises . . . [dividend] reduced when the 'national balance' is
The justification for excessive industrialism is that it is necessary to pump money into the economy through employment to keep everything going.
The social credit alternative is that if money is pumped into the economy through the dividend, it is the people, through their vote in the market, for
--There is a continuum from extremely rich to
incredibly poor in society. If the continuum is
weighted too much at the rich end, balance in the
Price - Demand equation can be reached quickly, and
the level of the National Dividend will be reduced,
without the very poor ever deriving much
YES!
VicB
- Original Message -
From:
Campbell Rayfield
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:09
AM
Subject: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Social Credit at
War?
The
last part of the A+B Theorem states that: Since
A will not purchase A plus B, a
