Re: [Soekris] net6501 and pfsense 2.x performance?
Send me a couple and ill figure all that out for you! ;) Sent from my iPhone On Sep 21, 2012, at 2:58 AM, Jeff Rhys-Jones wrote: > Hi guys, > > Has anyone had a chance to run some benchmarks using the net6501 and pfsense > 2.x? > > What is the max interface to interface firewall&routing the net6501 will > handle? > > Cheers, > > Jeff > ___ > Soekris-tech mailing list > Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com > http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Bridging OpenBSD
You really should be posting this to m...@openbsd.org On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Jan Ceuleers wrote: > Lars Noodén wrote: >> I've bridged vr0 - vr3 and they show up in the bridge. I've assigned an >> IP number to vr0 and serve DHCP to that ip range. If I connect to vr0, >> I can get an address via DHCP. If I connect to the other ports, then I >> cannot. If I understand correctly, connections from vr1 - vr3 will be >> bridged to vr0 and will get DHCP from vr0 via the bridge, but that is >> not happening. > > I'm a Linux guy and know nothing about *BSD. > > With Linux you need to assign the IP address to the bridge itself, > rather than to any of the interfaces that are part of it. Also the DHCP > server needs to be bound to the bridge. > > HTH, Jan > ___ > Soekris-tech mailing list > Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com > http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
[Soekris] interesting soekris article
I apologize if this is old news or off-topic, but I found it too interesting not to share. http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/01/wimpy_nodes/ -Bryan ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] FreeBSD 9.0 beta on a Net5501?
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:50 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've tried to update my net5501 running an old FreeBSD-current from >> october to 9.0 beta 1. Unfortunaly installworld crashed and the system >> is broken now : >> >> # make installworld >> ... >> ===> libexec/rtld-elf (install) >> chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 >> install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 -C -b -fschg -S ld-elf.so.1 /libexec >> install -o root -g wheel -m 444 rtld.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 >> *** Signal 4 >> >> Stop in /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> # ls >> Instruction interdite(core dumped) >> (instruction interdite => illegal/forbidden instruction) >> >> The world and kernel were built with llvm/clang. > > [CC-ing freebsd-current@] > > Is this issue resolved? > > I'm having a bunch of net4801 in production here, > and I was planning to move them to 9.0 soon after > RELEASE. So thanks for the heads up. I'll be holding > back now, and will stay with 8.2-STABLE. > > Unfortunately, I have no spare net4801 (and no net5501) > at the moment, so I can't test BETA on them. :( I have access to a 4801. I can test if needed. I don't run freebsd though so I'd need some help with understanding what needs to be tested. -Bryan ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] 4801 not seeing CF
Can you say what kind of cards they are? Manufacturer? Model? -Bryan On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Jim Cromie wrote: > I have a soekris 4801, and 2 CF disks, > 1st fails to boot, with following error, > 2nd boots fine. > > Cannot get disk parameters > boot: > > Is this disk too big ? > CHS out of range for bios ? > BTW, the manual is missing info on several bios settings, > bootpartition for one. Ive tried setting it to 1, (was disabled) > made no difference. > > $ sudo fdisk /dev/sdc > > Command (m for help): p > > Disk /dev/sdc: 4059 MB, 4059611136 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 493 cylinders, total 7928928 sectors > Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disk identifier: 0x000af39b > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sdc1 * 1 7920044 3960022 83 Linux > > Command (m for help): > Command (m for help): x > > Expert command (m for help): p > > Disk /dev/sdc: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 493 cylinders > > Nr AF Hd Sec Cyl Hd Sec Cyl Start Size ID > 1 80 0 2 0 254 63 492 1 7920044 83 > 2 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 > 3 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 > 4 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 > > Expert command (m for help): > > > In contrast, this CF is recognized and boots normally. > whats the salient difference ? > > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sdc1 * 1 1000927 500463+ 83 Linux > > Command (m for help): p > > Disk /dev/sdc: 512 MB, 512483328 bytes > 16 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1009 cylinders, total 1000944 sectors > Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disk identifier: 0x9bf54675 > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sdc1 * 1 1000927 500463+ 83 Linux > > Command (m for help): x > > Expert command (m for help): > Expert command (m for help): p > > Disk /dev/sdc: 16 heads, 62 sectors, 1009 cylinders > > Nr AF Hd Sec Cyl Hd Sec Cyl Start Size ID > 1 80 0 2 0 15 62 1008 1 1000927 83 > 2 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 > 3 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 > 4 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 > > Expert command (m for help): q > ___ > Soekris-tech mailing list > Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com > http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech > ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] any advantage using CF as well as HD ?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Philip wrote: > Hi > > I have a net5501 with a 40G laptop drive in it > it runs freebsd and the base OS is a broadband router and firewall > It also has two jails running. One is my web server and the other my mail > server. > Both are pretty low volume. > It sits on the end of a domestic cable internet service and I use dynamic dns > on it. > Both the net5501 and the cable modem are powered by an old 12V car battery so > I'm fairly immune to > power cuts. > > I also have an old desktop with debian which I use a samba file server. This > makes too much noise > and heat and generally upsets my wife, so I have been recycling an old Epia > 5000 board in a new case > with a 1T sata drive. I have to boot it from CF (using an IDE2CF adaptor) > because it wouldn't boot > from the sata. It is wonderfully quiet and I suspect (hope) that the 1T > drive is actually asleep > most of the time. > > This is making me wonder. Should I be booting the net5501 from CF as well > and mounting the HD as a > data store rather than actually running the OS on it? Will it make it more > reliable? I have had a > few servers fail over the years and it's usually the HD that goes. > I wouldn't be able to fit everything onto a CF card, the mail server in > particular is too big and so > would have to stay on the HD. What I did once was install an OS onto CF that had the boot and install image on it, then did an install onto an IDE disk (this was a 4801). So I in effect had a fully running system, that I could also in the event of an emergency boot from CF to fix or re-install the system. :-) -Bryan ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Life expectancy of a compact flash?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Ed Flecko wrote: > Hi folks, > When reading posts about setting up a Soekris using a compact flash, I > see a lot of people saying that a compact flash cannot withstand a lot > of writing before failing. > > 1.) Is that true? How much is "a lot" of writing? (My 4501 is for my > tiny, home network) > > 2.) How do you set up an OS (either OBSD or FBSD) to NOT write to a CF??? > > 3.) If you set it up to not write to your CF, how does your Soekris > manage to create log files??? I picked up a used 4801 a while ago, loaded a full install of openbsd on it to test just exactly that. I didn't care if it fried the card in a month or 2, or 6. It's been running now for over a year with no problems at all. I've used it exactly the same way I would if it had a disk in it. I'm not using any ramdisk trickery at all. It's completely stock. The only real benefit to a read-only filesystem is immediate recovery after power outage. -B ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Net5501 : No Boot device available, enter monitor.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:23 AM, lars nooden wrote: > I get this error often upon powering on a 5501: > > "No Boot device available, enter monitor." > > What's the best way to eliminate the message, aside from > power-cyclling or using the serial cable. What's your combios version? -B ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Installing Debian Squeeze
Something I've done from time to time is install to a virtualbox image, then convert that image, and use dd to put the image into a flash card. To me it was easier than having to set up PXE. Once made the image is always available. and one dd to a flash disk and you're done. just a thought. 2011/3/8 Blake Hodder > Hi, > > I have a Soekris net4521 and I am trying to install Debian Squeeze on it > via tftp boot and serial console. However; I get to where I can select > install from a menu list and then it sits at a blank screen. I am using the > buadrate of 19200 8n1 no flow control. Does anyone know how to successfully > install squeeze. I have tried using the wiki guide. > > Thanks in advanced, > > Blake > -- > > ___ > Soekris-tech mailing list > Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com > http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech > > <>___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Installing FreeBSD 8.0 on Soekris net5501
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote: > Dear all, > > I have just purchased a Soekris net5501 and tried to install FreeBSD > 8.0 on it. > However, I cannot get it to work, and I am hoping for your kind suggestions. > > I installed FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE i386 to a Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 (3.5" > 160GB) SATA harddisk on a different computer (let's call it SERVER). > Sliced and partionened the disk; enabled DHCP and SSH; installed the > FreeBSD. > Boots fine on SERVER. > > Then I connected the SATA disk to the Soekris box, and powered up. > > I have connected several different terminal emulators to the Soekris box: > Windows2000 / HyperTerminal > Windows2000 / TeraTerm > (Also tried Windows2000 / Poderosa; but missing the .NET libraries I did > not succede) > Ubuntu 9.04 / tip > Ubuntu 9.04 / gtkterm > Ubuntu 9.04 / cutecom > > For each of those I started out with 19200 baud, 8 bits, 1 stop bit. > > The Soekris box boots up nicely and shows the expected output in all the > terminal emulators. > I do not press control-P so Soekris loads the FreeBSD boot loader, which > correctly shows the F1, F2, F3 options. > I touch nothing and the boot loader (seemingly) starts to boot FreeBSD. > I get a lot of gibberish (kind of the same in all the above emulators). > However, i clearly notice some dash-slash-pipe-backslash repetiitons, so > I kind-of expcted that FreeBSD was booting. > After half a minute or so the output stops. > However, the terminal seems non-responsive to any input (letters, > CR/enter, control-C, etc). > > The Soekris box does not seem to acquire a DHCP address. > > After having tried this a lot of times (with the different terminal > emulators) I give up. > > I remount the disk in the SERVER. > The /var/log dir show NO log entries between the initial SERVER boot and > the current one. > So apparently the FreeBSD boot (if that is what is what) has not > progressed to find the disk. > > Just "for the fun of it" I installed Ubuntu Lucid Alpha2 desktop on a > free partition on the SERVER. > Btw, this owerwrote the FreeBSD bootloader with GRUB2. > (Yes, I could have chosen a stable server version of Ubuntu, but this > was the CD I happened to have lying around). > > Booting the Soekris box I get > GRUB loading. > error: no such partition > grub rescue> > > If I try the commands "?" or "help" I get > Unknown command > > If I try "ls /" I still get > error: no such partition > > Finally, on the SERVER I installed pfSense 2010.0217-2217. > (Works like a charm on the SERVER and another box) > > But booting the Soekris box gives > > FreeBSD/i386 boot > Default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/loader > boot: P > > Does anyone have a suggestion on what to try next ??? It sounds like FreeBSD changed the port settings. -B ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Linux on Soekris 5501
2010/2/16 Dilli R. Maharjan : > Hello, > I am new to Soekris device. I want to install Linux on Soekris 5501. Anyone, > please suggest better Linux distribution and experiences on installation. I > want to install Gentoo on it. Please share. I've done it a bunch of different ways with debian and OpenBSD. I've booted from cd key, I've installed to HD on external machine, PXE booted, and I even once copied a virtualbox image to a CF using the vB convert tools to make it raw and dd to copy to CF. ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] net5501, can't install pfsense, both serial ports not working
> now I think I am missing something. Is putty a program that can > operate serial ports on windows? Yes. In addition to being a good ssh client. ;-) -Bryan ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
[Soekris] Power savings
I was thinking of getting one of these little guys in my house. My excuse? Power savings over the existing firewall. I remember seeing something a long time ago that compared the cost savings of a full desktop firewall and a soekris, and basically the soekris pays for itself within x amount of time. I was wondering if anyone had a link to power comparisons. Google is not my friend today. TIA -Bryan ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] impossible to link eth1, eth2, eth3 but eth0 is well working
Top-posting because there's a lot here. Try assigning different ip ranges to the other interfaces and re-test. Bryan - On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:39 AM, stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I just receive on dec 2nd, my new "very expensive box" net5501-70 from > soekris USA. > I boot the net5501 with a 4 Go CF card and voyage-linux 0.5.2 OS > installed in. > My computer based on linux Ubuntu 8.04.1.is linked to the net5501. > BIOS v 133 > > The OS is working good and I made some tests in order to use it as a > router. > But it's impossible to communicate with eth1 eth2 eth3. eth0 is well > working. > > > --- > >> first test : work well > [ home PC] eth0 [ net5501] > 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.50 > > soekris:/etc# ping -I eth0 192.168.10.1 > PING 192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1) from 192.168.10.50 eth0: 56(84) bytes > of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.250 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.174 ms > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping 192.168.10.50 > PING 192.168.10.50 (192.168.10.50) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.10.50: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.242 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.10.50: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.10.50: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms > OK good > > --- > >> second test : > [ home PC] eth1 [ net5501] > 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.51 > > soekris:/etc# ping -I eth1 192.168.10.1 > PING 192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1) from 192.168.10.50 eth1: 56(84) bytes > of data. > From 192.168.10.50 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.10.50 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable > >>> no ping answer from the box net5501 !!! > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping 192.168.10.51 > PING 192.168.10.51 (192.168.10.51) 56(84) bytes of data. > From 192.168.10.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.10.1 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable > >>> no ping answer from my PC !!! > > soekris:/etc# ping 192.168.10.51 > PING 192.168.10.51 (192.168.10.51) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.10.51: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.191 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.10.51: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.143 ms > >>> only loopback ping on net5501 working > > >> third test : > no ping answer !!! > [ home PC] eth2 [ net5501] and same for eth3 > > --- > here are some tests result on my soekris > > soekris:/# netstat -i -e > Kernel Interface table > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:24:CB:51:EC > inet addr:192.168.10.50 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::200:24ff:fecb:51ec/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:29788 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:3404 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:7980048 (7.6 MiB) TX bytes:257892 (251.8 KiB) > Interrupt:11 > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:24:CB:51:ED > inet addr:192.168.10.51 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::200:24ff:fecb:51ed/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:2590 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:468 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:171058 (167.0 KiB) TX bytes:44456 (43.4 KiB) > Interrupt:5 Base address:0x2100 > > eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:24:CB:51:EE > inet addr:192.168.10.52 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::200:24ff:fecb:51ee/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:362 (362.0 b) TX bytes:468 (468.0 b) > Interrupt:9 Base address:0x6200 > > eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:24:CB:51:EF > inet addr:192.168.10.53 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) > Interrupt:12 Base address:0x8300 > > loLink encap:Local Loopback > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > RX packets:46560 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 fra
Re: [Soekris] net5501 doesn't boot from CF card
We had the same problem. We were using Kingston CF cards and switched to Sandisk. No problems since. I guess the problem lies with the card itself not doing something correctly. Maybe someone else can explain better. -B On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:32 AM, Thorsten M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My net5501 doesn't boot from the CF card. My net4501 has no problem with > exactly the same card. Here are my BIOS settings: > > ConSpeed = 19200 > ConLock = Enabled > ConMute = Disabled > BIOSentry = Enabled > PCIROMS = Enabled > PXEBoot = Disabled > FLASH = Primary > BootDelay = 5 > FastBoot = Disabled > BootPartition = Disabled > BootDrive = 80 81 F0 FF > ShowPCI = Enabled > Reset = Hard > CpuSpeed = Default > > > > And the boot log: > > > > comBIOS ver. 1.33 20070103 Copyright (C) 2000-2007 Soekris Engineering. > > net5501 > > 0512 Mbyte MemoryCPU Geode LX 500 Mhz > > Pri Sla CHS Xlt 1024-5-63 161 Mbyte > > Slot Vend Dev ClassRev Cmd Stat CL LT HT Base1Base2 Int > --- > 0:01:2 1022 2082 1010 0006 0220 08 00 00 A000 10 > 0:06:0 1106 3053 0296 0117 0210 08 40 00 E101 A0004000 11 > 0:07:0 1106 3053 0296 0117 0210 08 40 00 E201 A0004100 05 > 0:08:0 1106 3053 0296 0117 0210 08 40 00 E301 A0004200 09 > 0:09:0 1106 3053 0296 0117 0210 08 40 00 E401 A0004300 12 > 0:14:0 104C AC23 06040002 0107 0210 08 40 01 > 0:20:0 1022 2090 06010003 0009 02A0 08 40 80 6001 6101 > 0:20:2 1022 209A 01018001 0005 02A0 08 00 00 > 0:21:0 1022 2094 0C031002 0006 0230 08 00 80 A0005000 15 > 0:21:1 1022 2095 0C032002 0006 0230 08 00 00 A0006000 15 > 1:00:0 100B 0020 0200 0107 0290 00 40 00 D001 A400 10 > 1:01:0 100B 0020 0200 0107 0290 00 40 00 D101 A4001000 07 > 1:02:0 100B 0020 0200 0107 0290 00 40 00 D201 A4002000 10 > 1:03:0 100B 0020 0200 0107 0290 00 40 00 D301 A4003000 07 > > 1 Seconds to automatic boot. Press Ctrl-P for entering Monitor. > > Intel UNDI, PXE-2.0 (build 082) > Copyright (C) 1997,1998,1999 Intel Corporation > VIA Rhine III Management Adapter v2.43 (2005/12/15) > PXE-E61: Media test failure, check cable > > PXE-M0F: Exiting Intel PXE ROM. > > No Boot device available, enter monitor. > > > comBIOS Monitor. Press ? for help. > > ___ > Soekris-tech mailing list > Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com > http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech > ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
[Soekris] net5501 error light stays on
After setting my console to 38400 (and finding out that it might not support that) when I boot the 5501 the errors light stays on. I've connected to it using a 28.8 speed but only get a single odd character that looks like a ? in a box. I've tried setting the speed back as documented but suspect it may be suffering from issue 0005. However when I short the pins it does not continue the bootup.and the error light stays on. It did come with another 5501 that suffers from the same issue but that one does boot after shorting the pins, so it's likely to have come from the same batch. Is there anything else I can try? Or do I just need to ship them back for repairs? -Bryan ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
