s list, but have no further interest
>> in dealing with these folks.
>>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.soekris.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/attachments/20160222/e0607d2a/attachment-0001.html>
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/2016 03:33 AM, Martin Dahlem wrote:
> ... we have chosen to abandon Soekris since.
Can anyone on the list share which vendor, model, and OS to which they
have switched?
I switched from Cisco devices over to Soekris so that I could better
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:53:27 +0100
Muffinman wrote:
> I have a net6501 which was supplied with the original heatsink. After
> all the reports of failing net6501's, I began to develop some fear for
> its life, especially since it is suggested the failures are related to
>
On 2016-02-22 6:33 AM, Martin Dahlem wrote:
> I think I have had about 25-30 net6501 during the last 4 years. About 10 of
> those where from the first time of life, with the very simple heatsink that
> where only a black plate.
> I have had massive issues with them failing, so we have chosen to
Same problem here. In December I lost two of those boards after 4 years
of service and Soekris also refused to replace them.
Both of them were running fine until I did a power cycle. After that
only the Error LED came on and no BIOS on the console. Even a new PSU
did not help.
My net5501's on
I have a net6501 which was supplied with the original heatsink. After
all the reports of failing net6501's, I began to develop some fear for
its life, especially since it is suggested the failures are related to
overheating and in particular this older type of heatsink. I emailed
Soekris with the
On 21/02/16 23:26, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> There's a bias problem here: You're only going to hear from the
> people who lost machines, not from those who didn't.
To provide a datapoint: we manage/operate something like ~170 net6501-70
units, and ignoring SSD and PSU failures, I think we've