So, we can consider our patch or somethings like that a valid solution
for this segfault?! :)
Thanks you very much.
Happy Christmas and Happy New Year!
Ge@@ru
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 15:13 +0200, Pekka Pessi wrote:
2007/12/7, Ge@@ru [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I try to use STUN feature of Sofia i have
by stun_handle_destroy. So where we have to call
stun_handle_destroy?
Or however patch in attach seems resolve problem.
Could be a valid solution patch attached?
Thanks in advance.
Bye
Ge@@ru Stefano Marengo
1996a1997,1998
req-sr_state = stun_req_dispose_me;
2000d2001
req-sr_state = stun_req_dispose_me
with route is correct.
I appended patch for nta.c file.
Can anyone said me if you can add this patch to source? Thanks
Ge@@ru
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 08:46 +0100, Ge@@ru wrote:
Hi,
As i said on irc i see that mtu value on tport_tsend function isn't set
a default value if there isn't
this problem:
- i save tport object (TCP) from register message,
- i use saved tport object for send INVITE.
So, if i don't set TPTAG_MTU i have Message too long error.
This error isn't handled with same message if i don't use saved tport
object.
Still thanks to pessi for your help.
Good work.
Bye
Ge@@ru
to became
multiplexed protocols (or at least i think :) ).
Still thanks for your avaibility.
Good work!
Ge@@ru
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 18:37 +0200, Pekka Pessi wrote:
2007/11/12, Ge@@ru [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My target:
Use stun_bind on socket created for receive my data.
At moment, seems
of one su_wait_t object for same events and same
socket?
How can i use STUN for an address(IP:port) that i use for a service? I
need bind a socket, check my public ip, close socket and open binding
socket on same ip:port for send/receive my data?
Thanks in advance.
Ge@@ru
, in this case my callback isn't called. I needed insert
tport_pending_error (self, NULL, ECOMM);
on tport_recv_event function (on tport.c) before tport_shutdown0 (about
at row 2866).
Could this a solution correct? Have you an idea how manage this
exceptions?
Thanks in advance.
Ge@@ru
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 15:39 +0200, Pekka Pessi wrote:
2007/10/30, Ge@@ru [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
why on hash_resize macro (su/sofia-sip/htable.h) there isn't su_free of
old_hash? There is a su_zalloc call for allocate a new memory area but
then i don't see su_free of old data.
Looks like
Hi,
why on hash_resize macro (su/sofia-sip/htable.h) there isn't su_free of
old_hash? There is a su_zalloc call for allocate a new memory area but
then i don't see su_free of old data.
Thanks in advance.
Ge@@ru
) and save pointer to a global struct.
When you want send message through this open connection you must create
message and send with
nta_outgoing_mcreate function with tags
NTATAG_TPORT (tport_saved)
Thanks and good work.
Ge@@ru
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 15:28 +0200, Ge@@ru
for recover tport_t of
accepted connection?
Still, thanks.
Ge@@ru
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 15:28 +0300, Pekka Pessi wrote:
2007/10/8, Ge@@ru [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i have some questions about use of outbound mode.
Usually when an user agent send a register message open an ephemeral
port and send message
NUTAG_OUTBOUND tag of
nua_register function?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Bye
Ge@@ru
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events
12 matches
Mail list logo
