2007/12/20, Ge@@ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, we can consider our patch or somethings like that a valid solution
> for this segfault?! :)
Certainly yes, but it is not solving all the cases.
> Happy Christmas and Happy New Year!
Merry Christmas everyone!
--Pekka
> On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 15:13 +0
So, we can consider our patch or somethings like that a valid solution
for this segfault?! :)
Thanks you very much.
Happy Christmas and Happy New Year!
Ge@@ru
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 15:13 +0200, Pekka Pessi wrote:
> 2007/12/7, Ge@@ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I try to use STUN feature of Sofia i
2007/12/7, Ge@@ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I try to use STUN feature of Sofia i have the following problem:
>
> If i try to destroy stun_handle_t (with stun_handle_destroy) inside
> stun_bind_cb there is always a segfault at row 2001 of stun.c file
> because sofia try to access to req variable after
I try to use STUN feature of Sofia i have the following problem:
If i try to destroy stun_handle_t (with stun_handle_destroy) inside
stun_bind_cb there is always a segfault at row 2001 of stun.c file
because sofia try to access to req variable after that req is been
destroyed by stun_handle_destro
