>>> You have to obtain the root (via su_root_obtain()) that is used by nta
>>> in order to access the nta objects in safe manner. (The original
>>> thread used to create the root object must first release it with
>>> su_root_release()).
>>
>> Like locking/unlocking a mutex, understood.
>>
>> I gues
2008/12/11 Aleksander Morgado :
>> You have to obtain the root (via su_root_obtain()) that is used by nta
>> in order to access the nta objects in safe manner. (The original
>> thread used to create the root object must first release it with
>> su_root_release()).
>
> Like locking/unlocking a mutex
>>
>> In a brief, is making the home of NTA agent thread-safe enough for all
>> those situations?
>
> Unfortunately no. The nta functions are thread-safe in the mean that
> they do not use any shared global data, the nta objects like nta_leg_t
> or nta_agent_t are not thead-safe.
>
> You have to ob
2008/12/9 Aleksander Morgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After creating a NTA agent with a thread-safe home, is it ok to assume
> that any other thread can call nta_leg_destroy() without any
> synchronism problem?
>
> What if nta_leg_destroy() is called from a given thread, and meanwhile
> the "main" th
