Hi,
I' have done my dns resolution solution . And I do not know why,
sometimes, randomly I got bugs which makes my program failed. (Assertion
failure, or sup-tid different from thread pid ! Whereas my root objects
are always used with the same thread...). (Bug that hardly happend in
gdb...
Pekka Pessi a écrit :
On 5/11/06, Thomas Rosenblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I' have done my dns resolution solution . And I do not know why,
sometimes, randomly I got bugs which makes my program failed. (Assertion
failure, or sup-tid different from thread pid ! Whereas my root objects
are
On 5/11/06, Thomas Rosenblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I' have done my dns resolution solution . And I do not know why,
sometimes, randomly I got bugs which makes my program failed. (Assertion
failure, or sup-tid different from thread pid ! Whereas my root objects
are always used with the same
Hi,
I'have found a little bug in sres_create_error_rr. (in the last version
not in previous)
sr-sr_name = q-q_name should be remplaced by :
sr-sr_name = sres_toplevel(...)
Because if not, the last dot of a domain name is forgot by the
sres_store, and so the domain is not found in sres_get...
On 5/11/06, Thomas Rosenblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have it when the sup_tid is different from thread pid:)
in the su_root_destroy()
---assert(SU_ROOT_OWN_THREAD(self))
How do you call su_root_destroy()? Do you su_root_break() if you are
in callback, and call su_root_destroy() only after
This posting was generated automatically from darcs repo
http://dev-126.openlaboratory.net/repos.
Tue May 9 21:49:57 EEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* nua_register.c: use nua-generated contact for refresh interval calculation.
Allow SIPS uris in contacts, too.
M
This posting was generated automatically from darcs repo
http://dev-126.openlaboratory.net/repos.
Thu May 11 20:44:54 EEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Updated win32 ChangeLog.
M ./win32/ChangeLog +19
Thu May 11 20:44:28 EEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Added more info about outbound, gruu
On 5/11/06, Thomas Rosenblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'have found a little bug in sres_create_error_rr. (in the last version
not in previous)
sr-sr_name = q-q_name should be remplaced by :
sr-sr_name = sres_toplevel(...)
Because if not, the last dot of a domain name is forgot by the
