I can't speak from personal experience with Softimage running from a
network, but one thing to keep in mind is that Linux (specifically NFS)
does a much better job than Windows (specifically CIFS/SMB) of caching
files and not always pounding the network over and over again for the same
stuff.
I
Really nice work Marco, I love the particle effects in there. Were they
rendered with Arnold as well?
N
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Marco Levantaci
Sent: Monday, 8 October 2012 9:05 PM
To:
Troubles here.
Am 08.10.2012 21:39, schrieb piotrek marczak:
Ive had this error (and many others), try uninstalling
sp1...
You mean work with SI 2013 (11_0), not SI 2013 SP1 (11_1), right?
Thank you Mr. Chris and Mr. Dan.
:)
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Dan Yargici danyarg...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I never! Good day sir!
On 8 Oct 2012 13:27, Keith Fallon keithmfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok - figured it out.
So I was pulling the Combo from a Color_Multi-Switch node and should have
used a Color4_Array_Switch node.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Keith Fallon keithmfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Sajjad - I'll take a look at that.
Keith
And the code to to get the Combo value should read:
var oFoo = PPG.Inspected(0).Parameters(Type).Value;
the camera data are interpreted different or the units of measure are out
between imagemodeller and Softimage? what format are you importing /
exporting with? if its FBX I believe there is/are issues with camera data
between applications, no?
try another format or version of FBX perhaps?
On 9
I usually get cameras in via FBX or Collada which have pixel aspect 0.9 and
the image ratio is off by the same ratio, so I would check those two first.
Morten
Den 9. oktober 2012 kl. 15:54 skrev Rob Chapman tekano@gmail.com:
different or the units of measure are out between imagemodeller
We use Okino's Polytran, and we have been using STEP with good success.
On 10/9/2012 10:50 AM, Byron Nash wrote:
I am going to receive some CAD models from a vendor and they have
asked what format I prefer them in. Every time I have gotten CAD data
it has been a huge pain in the neck. I
I've always tried to get IGES. My understanding is that it's sort of the
OBJ of the CAD world. Fairly universal, supported by most packages, etc.
MOI supports IGES directly and works well with it. Otherwise I've used
Deep Exploration with a lot of success.
-Paul
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50
I've used IGES into MoI a lot for this and it's always worked great.
What issues were you having? I find the meshing options you have in MoI
to be excellent and fast. In version 2 the meshing got a lot faster and
handles larger files better. Quick and simple, it doesn't get a lot
easier
Hi Chris,
I've got 6.02 on this machine. Send it over and I'll have it back to you in
a jiffy.
Patrick
On 9 October 2012 16:02, Chris Marshall chrismarshal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have an old .hrc model from the Old softimage days that I need to get
into New Softimage. The model
Superb,
Thanks
On 9 October 2012 16:37, patrick nethercoat patr...@brandtanim.co.ukwrote:
Hi Chris,
I've got 6.02 on this machine. Send it over and I'll have it back to you
in a jiffy.
Patrick
On 9 October 2012 16:02, Chris Marshall chrismarshal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have
Well, IGES is a bit more like the DXF of polygons IMO ;-) It's pretty
stupid although it can work well.
I usually ask for the files in Step, Sat and IGES (as fallback) and try
what works best - the first two contain more useful information while IGES
usually doesn't preserve naming etc. but that
Hi Konstantin,
the command you said gave me this back:
[root@huevo36 ~]# find /mnt/UN_GALLO/3D/SOFTIMAGE/ANIMATIC3D ~/Autodesk -user
root
/root/Autodesk
/root/Autodesk/registry.xsi_2013-64.huevo36
/root/Autodesk/Softimage_2013
/root/Autodesk/Softimage_2013/_DSRTL.MTT
as i mentioned SP1 was not supported yet. i posted a snip of code which was
only a hint. i can try and update it today.
steven
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Eugen Sares softim...@keyvis.at wrote:
Didn't manage to include SI 2013 SP1 in the .cmake file.
Syntactically, I got it right, but
btw, what is your install path for 2013 SP1?
s
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Steven Caron car...@gmail.com wrote:
as i mentioned SP1 was not supported yet. i posted a snip of code which
was only a hint. i can try and update it today.
steven
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Eugen Sares
Thanks, Steven!
C:\Softimage\Softimage 2013 SP1
I set that correctly in the cmake file.
I tried this:
line 53 in FindSoftimage.cmake -
set (SOFTPATHS_11_1
"c:/Softimage/Softimage 2013 SP1/XSISDK/include/"
ok, you still use a custom install location. i will add this...
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Eugen Sares softim...@keyvis.at wrote:
Thanks, Steven!
C:\Softimage\Softimage 2013 SP1
I set that correctly in the cmake file.
I tried this:
line 53 in FindSoftimage.cmake -
set
i just updated the repo, are you using source control at all? if so, just
pull the changes otherwise download the FindSoftimage.cmake file and
replace your existing one.
https://github.com/caron/TapeMeasure/blob/master/CMake/Modules/FindSoftimage.cmake
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Steven
At one point we actually did a test to see if asset caching locally would
net us any speed, and somewhat surprisingly we found out that no matter
what, we couldn't beat the local caching of NFS in any way. It's usually
that good.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Andy Jones andy.jo...@gmail.com
I was having probems with this the other day as well, but I got it
working.. eventually. I used the spawn on trigger, and just had to
make sure I specified the target pointcloud in the spawn ppg..
It was a bit finicky though.. I had to go back through the docs again, came
across the same
22 matches
Mail list logo
