Great idea Brad. 2-4, 6,8 stands out for me.
On 3/27/2013 11:53 PM, Bradley Gabe wrote:
> Hi Softimage Users!
>
> I have only a few more months before I'm off to grad school full time and
> thought it might be mutually beneficial for our community to come up with
> some sort of Softimag
i doubt it, processing flag is there for that exact reason. we have
been using for a long time, 2007 maybe. they obviously only care about
one renderer. requiring another softimage license would be cost
prohibative. they could do a lot of damage if they change this!
s
*written with my thum
Im not in front if softimage or documentation atm, but look for "Menu anchor
points" in the docs. If there is no anchor for this menu it I'm affraid the
answer is no.
On 30.03.2013, at 12:32, Tomas Roth wrote:
> Hi, is there any way how to add item to this context menu?
>
Hi, is there any way how to add item to this context menu?
<>
In Thunderbird i cant see any attatchments, what is quite annoying...
becouse thats my usual email-checking tool.
Wenn i view the mails via mail.google.com i see these attatchments.
Am 29.03.2013 23:39, schrieb Ahmidou Lyazidi:
I can see the attachment too!
---
"lets you render using 3rd party renderers without pulling the limited
xsibatch tokens"
Sorry, guys, but this is too huge a discovery to let sink in this thread!
GREAT find Andy! It would never occur to me that -processing could be
exploited for render purposes. I imagine this loophole will be
6 matches
Mail list logo
