Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-09 Thread Kris Rivel
istproc.autodesk.com > [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Juhani Karlsson > Sent: 04 May 2012 13:14 > To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > Subject: Re: CgChannel coverage > > Thats a good attitude! ; ) > > - Juhani > 2012/5/4 Chris Chia mail

Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Matt Morris
he concern about > the mixed messages this type of thing gives out. > > G > > > From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto: > softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Juhani Karlsson > Sent: 04 May 2012 13:14 > To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com &

RE: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Graham Bell
-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Juhani Karlsson Sent: 04 May 2012 13:14 To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: Re: CgChannel coverage Thats a good attitude! ; ) - Juhani 2012/5/4 Chris Chia mailto:chris.c...@autodesk.com>> Hi Matt

RE: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Williams, Wayne
8:11 AM To: Subject: Re: CgChannel coverage Hi Matt, That must decided by the higher management. Anyway, i believe ChunPong has introduced his team to ease the panic in the mailing list a while ago. Despite that, users still make a lot of assumption. I think we can only prove to them by action

Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Juhani Karlsson
Thats a good attitude! ; ) - Juhani 2012/5/4 Chris Chia > Hi Matt, > That must decided by the higher management. Anyway, i believe ChunPong has > introduced his team to ease the panic in the mailing list a while ago. > Despite that, users still make a lot of assumption. I think we can only > pr

Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Chris Chia
Hi Matt, That must decided by the higher management. Anyway, i believe ChunPong has introduced his team to ease the panic in the mailing list a while ago. Despite that, users still make a lot of assumption. I think we can only prove to them by actions (instead of words). Regards, Chris On 4

Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Matt Morris
Hi Chris, the article makes a lot of assumptions based on the information that came out in the mailing list. An official announcement/press release might help? Regards, Matt On 4 May 2012 12:27, Chris Chia wrote: > Hi Matt, > Thanks for the link. I have googled that too. Guess we will have to

Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Rob Wuijster
Hi Chris, here ya go: http://www.cgchannel.com/2012/05/autodesk-reshuffles-softimage-development-team/ irritating piece of half thruths ands assumptions Rob \/-\/\/ On 4-5-2012 13:14, Chris Chia wrote: Hi Matt, Thanks for bringing that out. Could you provide us w

Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Chris Chia
Hi Matt, Thanks for the link. I have googled that too. Guess we will have to work harder to prove to the Softimage community to gain their faith. Regards, Chris Chia Softimage QA Analyst Autodesk Media & Entertainment On 4 May, 2012, at 7:22 PM, "Matt Morris" mailto:matt...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Matt Morris
Sorry a link would help eh ;) http://www.cgchannel.com/2012/05/autodesk-reshuffles-softimage-development-team/ On 4 May 2012 12:14, Chris Chia wrote: > Hi Matt, > Thanks for bringing that out. > Could you provide us with the link? > And please rest assured that we are a far bigger team. > >

RE: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Stephen Blair
http://www.cgchannel.com/2012/05/autodesk-reshuffles-softimage-development-team/ From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Chia Sent: May-04-12 7:14 AM To: Subject: Re: CgChannel coverage Hi Matt, Thanks for bringing that

Re: CgChannel coverage

2012-05-04 Thread Chris Chia
Hi Matt, Thanks for bringing that out. Could you provide us with the link? And please rest assured that we are a far bigger team. Regards, Chris Chia Softimage QA Analyst Autodesk Media & Entertainment On 4 May, 2012, at 5:46 PM, "Matt Morris" mailto:matt...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, just a qui